dman sorry but i have never seen a person so ignorant like you
you have no proves and you cannot stand a debate without writing your nonsense crap.
Operation Tannenbaum was real yes, and it is why we had the second national army call since WWI, to defend switzerland. Switzerlan knew that chances were low to win, so the plan was to defend mountains and to cut Europe in 2 parts. In the south there were italians and in the north germans, and they would have had big problems cause the swiss national defense plan since WWI has been to build bunkers on mountains with inside everything ! tanks, airplanes, munitions, food ... and those bunkers were positioned to aim on the only entrances of our valleys. Come here and you will learn new things, cause you don't seem to understan much. We would have lost for sure, but we would have inflicted many many losses to the enemy. First, the air support would have been useless, cause without radars on plane they would have had troubles in mountains, second, in our militia army (even now) the first focus is fighting in mountaineous terrain, so we have an advantage even against professional armies. Third, not knowing the terrain, they couldn't have used the artillery, while the swiss artillery was prepared to fight on mountains and to calculate trajectories with mountains in the middle (and by mountains i mean 4000m, not hills). so, as stated by german forces, this conquest would have cost too much for too little advantages.
Swiss cowards ? they have been always neutral and democratic. People voted to be neutral and nobody asked to join the war, so it was a popular decision. if you cannot accept it, well ... we don't care
About the swiss slaves, again you need to improve your german cause you understood nothing ahha there is a law allowing to separate families in some extreme cases, the exact thing done at your border with mexico with miigrant families (in 2019) lol ... slavery in 19th century and even now, and you give me lessons, poor boy. But anyway, the law allowed the poor families in the city to lose their child if they abandoned him, if they were treatening him badly, and so on ... the state then, instead of placing children in orphanages, were brought to farms, why ? because farms had food to sustain larger families while orphanages didn't ! here even my grandparents and my neighbourg were placed during summer on mountains in farms, because families in valleys and cities didn't have enough food to survive ! so children were brought by force or obligated by lack of food to go to farms ... for cheap labor ? maybe ! my grandfather always told me it was a necessity, he couldn't refuse orders from the farmer cause he was there to work. working for food. And nobody paid the state to live on farms, you are inventing a legend ahah
read this ...
Die rechtliche Grundlage der Kindswegnahmen fand sich im Zivilgesetzbuch von 1912, welches bei pflichtwidrigem Verhalten der Eltern, dauernder Gefährdung oder ganz allgemein bei Verwahrlosung die Vormundschaftsbehörden legitimierte, den Eltern das Sorgerecht über ihre Kinder zu entziehenit means that in the laws of 1912 there was a law allowing the state to take children from families in some cases, and they used it to take children from gypsies ... nothing to do with the initial children you were quoting that were swiss and taken - using the same legal system - from families to be sent on farms. It was not a good system and the state apologized for that, but there have been no decisions to make those associations to pay for abuses. so the state tried to compensate by itself, no charity as you define it.
again, removing locks from my door and accepting everyone ... you don't know me, i already do that
i am not an ignorant person like you are, so to me there is no problem to debate, to talk and to accept people, as there is no problem to serve in my army to defend my country, to be a politician, to study, to work and everything else ... and overall to learn and to understand things, not writing crap with nosense like you do
about switzerland accepting german gold and other properties ... i think you are the first not understanding the difference between state and private property lol. Banks accepted gold and the swiss borders were closed in general. so the state was neutral, but banks accepted Allied capitals and nazi capitals while swiss weapons factories were selling weapons to both sides, this is neutrality ... you advantage both sides equally
and americans were not against that, they could have a forward base where to operate spying missions.
Guys let Trump alone, from the beginning the topic was elsewhere, the fact that Europe and many other countries want to see USA stopping to be the world police but it never ends. If trump is impeached or not or whatever it is going on, nobody talks about that here because we don't really care, we have never seen a big difference among presidents and at the end here we increase trade and economical agreements with the east rather than the west. Switzerland made a free trade agreement with china but not yet with USA, now we try to expand borders to Russia and the east. The first partner of iran in europe is italy, italy doesn't want to intervene against iran. France and Germany have internal problems cause a larger % of people don't want to send armies abroad again ... Spain, Greece, portugal have refused to increase expenditures on military side (asked by the usa) because they have an european rule to respect, a debt rule and they are already too much in debt. It is why there is a larger part of the population who just wants to leave in peace ... many never intervened in no wars, and never had terroristic attacks ! it is why they say "no interventions abroad, no problems". USA could do the same ...
