Feniks wrote:
Answer the simple question. How can it be a nation action when the nation gains nothing? Gold, ships .... everything goes to only the citizens that decide to join in. Nation coffers have gained nothing.
Fair enough.
Nations are made up of her citizens. The government is to serve those citizens.
In this case, action to address the issues with Big Tea are limited as a government. The government cannot impound ships or seize property. We cannot capture, imprison or hang anyone as a government. The government cannot even issue bounties nor forgive tax debt.
The government nor her citizens gain from deporting Big Tea. Some citizens want his citizenship maintained for the charter bank bonus.
By giving citizens the power to excersise the only justice available to them, as King, I can declare him an Enemy of the Crown. By sanctioning it as a national campaign, citizens have the right to attain a wee bit of swag and some satisfaction by plundering his fleets.
Is it a perfect solution? Nope. But it took care of the citizens' needs.
Now, as for peaceful banker, I general am pretty easy going, but I'm not dead! As for Tokelau, she is a neutral nation - her ports came from citizens coming over to Tokelau, not through conquest. We citizens maintain and defend them.
Finally, Big Tea made a shrewd play as becoming a citizen of Tokelau and a member of VUDU. Tokelau was a stable wealthy nation, and VUDU was a place he knew his enterprise would be defended.
He's abandoned both.
The way I understand it, you have stated we have the right to regain his wealth - maybe, maybe not. What we have gained as a nation is the knowledge we can united and work together effectively in naval operations, and have stated to the subjects, while it be far from perfect, the government of Tokelau will do its best to issue justice - while the coffers of the Tokelau treasury may not benefit, the sense of patriotism will greatly benefit.