Psychodad wrote:So to paraphrase, A player hit you with voodoo, was better defended so you couldn't successfully (read take treasure) so instead you found those who did nothing to you and made short work of them to show Tom Lowe (I think, hard to keep up) the error of his ways?
I understand that you made gestures of diplomacy, which in this game are a joke anyway, but let's give credit for the gesture, yet all the while you were attacking the innocent members of his guild? How many attacks against SHM, and Black Sparrow were conducted, and if they were, were they the full onslaught of your mighty prowess as a voodoo master and nautical warlord?
If it wasn't fear that kept you from attacking the members of the guild that could defend themselves then why didn't you attack them with the same ferocity as the weaker members?
Not quite what happened.
Tom has been casting on several members of VUDU, not just dman. His cast have nothing to do with making a profit because he rarely hits once someone is lit up. He is simply throwing around voodoo. In response to inquiries of his motive, we were informed he is training players. The problem with that response is none of the other members of Ravenlocke are hitting fleets that are lit either.
This is not training, this is not for profit, this has been going on for more probably 2 weeks or more now. So to Banger point in his OP, and according to the limited guidelines laid out by CJ, this is the true definition of griefing.
Continuous casting on a player or group with no profit motive or other legitimate motive.
I posted that the parameters of offense need to be more detailed, but this does in fact fall under what CJ described.