PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
I agree.
PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
Dejanira wrote:PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
I agree.
Feniks wrote:Dejanira wrote:PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
I agree.
That was the genesis of the whole war.
PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
Shadowood wrote:PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
I agree because it's destructive, but then again I don't because it's a valid tactic. It is a play on "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend". Based on this one can deduce that "The Friend of my Enemy is my Enemy".
DezNutz wrote:PhoenixKnight wrote:I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?
I agree because it's destructive, but then again I don't because it's a valid tactic. It is a play on "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend". Based on this one can deduce that "The Friend of my Enemy is my Enemy".