VUDU vs. MERC - Ceasefire Treaty

[Dejanira]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree.

[sXs]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree.

That was the genesis of the whole war.

[PhoenixKnight]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree.

That was the genesis of the whole war.

Then don’t start another

[DezNutz]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree because it's destructive, but then again I don't because it's a valid tactic. It is a play on "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend". Based on this one can deduce that "The Friend of my Enemy is my Enemy".

[Shadowood]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree because it's destructive, but then again I don't because it's a valid tactic. It is a play on "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend". Based on this one can deduce that "The Friend of my Enemy is my Enemy".

I agree with what Shadowood said

[PhoenixKnight]

I also want to add that I am tired of the insanity of “ we cannot hurt the one who is pissing us off, so we will hurt everyone who is remotely affiliated with him” what kind of logic is this?

I agree because it's destructive, but then again I don't because it's a valid tactic. It is a play on "The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend". Based on this one can deduce that "The Friend of my Enemy is my Enemy".

So by your Logic, if UK picks a fight with Tokelau, then SKN will be the enemy of both!

[Charles Vane]

Not when both are friendly to Kitts no. Kitts would need to remain neutral in both nations eyes or risk losing an alliance.


Comes down to this, those with assets and much to lose need to pick their enemies better and take a stance more like Phoenix and rely on diplomacy and pay offs.

[Dmanwuzhere]

quit playing with your profile it skeers me

[Charles Vane]

gotta stay busy somehow waiting on this damned flagship

[Stan Rogers]

It again comes back to being able to attack without any fear of reprisal.

Is reworking the Thieving Magpie card worth mentioning ?
Suggestion:
If player has less than 10 ships at sea, Magpie effect increases 10x removing 1 rare, 3 uncommon, 7 common voodoo cards from their chest.

Sorry again for what could be perceived as a thread derail but I cannot help think this war/treaty and my topic are closely related