SDK wrote:It's still better than 3:1. That's the main focus of the card. Not to be 4:1 every time. I know it isn't a perfect ratio, but it is certainly better than that of 3:1
Meant for taking fewer defends and increasing profit at the end of a few short-term battles or long drawn out raids. Not meant for casual plundering, just a slight profit and ratio booster.
That can be achieved via 3 Hideouts at a better ratio and more profit. Your card will only have potential for more profit and less defenses if you complete a large specific amount of attacks before taking a single defense. For example if you don't defend after the first 4, you would need to do another 7 (total of 11) to have the max number of attacks with the least number of defenses per danger gained.
If you are plundering max attacks per each defense (normal 3:1), with your card you would be alternating between 4:1 and 3:1 for each defense and would require 63 battles with 18 defenses to have an equal profit versus casting 3 hideouts, after that point your card would have a greater ratio and profit margin per defense.
I'd say its worth it 
