DezNutz wrote:Mack wrote:Yeah I think the USA Council is very self-serving that's why I left
Ok. I guess deporting inactives, the basis of the disagreement, is now self-serving.
Getting way off topic, and that's besides the point, we settled our differences and Mack is always welcome back to the USA, and the USA has extended an offering of support to Mack if he needs it.
To Taylor/All:
Although, I would like someone to please find me a nation that does not serve it's self interests. A nation is a collective of people who work together to serve a common interest. The council is the main point of where direction and interest is determined as in most cases the council holds the largest voting block. The council isn't a group of elected officials and anyone can be on the council.
If someone does not like the way the council is being run, they have the option to either leave the nation to build or find another nation, or complete nation missions, obtain enough influence to join the council, and push to make the changes from within the council. Bitching and moaning about how the nation should be run when you haven't completed nations missions is not how nations work. I would really enjoy seeing you complain about a decision a council made without your opinion in another nation, when you haven't reached the council. I'm sure they would they would just bend over backwards to accommodate your every little complaint.
"A nation is a collective of people who work together to serve a common interest."
Danik wrote:See, it would all have been much easier and happy if The LoveTiger was still in charge!
But seriously : the way nations are set up and how the voting power table works does mean maintaining a coherent and equitable democracy is a non-starter : in the end, like it or lump it, the mostest votes decides, whatever your rank or opinion, however fair or unfair the outcome may be. It dont do much to complain or argue from a position of weakness outside the council for, as Deznutz says, that's where the power to decide lies. In that is the grounds for much dis-satisfaction and conflict but its hard to see how the running of nations in the game can be any other way.
+1
One only needs to look at the laws of a nation to see whose interest the nation serves. As far as the voting block goes.... well I have had issue with that from day 1. Personally, I defer to all citizens and with hold my vote on changes until everyone has a chance to voice their own opinion. If you take the time to explain and argue for your proposed changes, and make your case, there is usually no need for council to even vote. This is where USA failed here, but i give credit to Dez for admitting their failure in this matter.
Every nation has the right to be run how it's citizens deem is in their own best interest. Tokelau laws are favorable to bankers and their stipend law serves the newest citizens in the nation. Bermudas laws are set up, at least from an outsiders perspective, to build reserves and protect the ports they have. Montenegro's laws are set to build reserves to help defend newly acquired port. Spain current Stipend laws are set to help all those not on the council, but the least among them. USA laws..... well..... I guess that is for their citizens to determine.