Psychodad wrote:DoS wrote:Plato wrote:You can not get into regime change. But a response was a must.
No regime change action has ever had a positive result.e
I don't think bombing an airbase was an appropriate response.Bmw wrote:you do realize that the usa is working with a group of "rebels" to overthrow the Assad government and put in place a western government. The rebel group was on its own for a number of years before the usa came and supplied it weapons (the weapons were not sent for free same with aid for the military) the rebel group approached the US government wanting to buy arms and other weapons to fight the assad government and isis.
Thanks for telling me? Got any more random facts? Did you know a banana is actually a berry and a strawberry is not?
You serious about the banana berry?
No regime change action has ever had a positive result? Really? Then perhaps we should have kept Hitler in Germany, Mussolini in Italy, and Tojo in Japan.
Btw, next time we do attack Syria, it may indeed target the Assad residence, as some people cannot take the hint. We did this in Libya, and only wounded Gadaffi, but killed his daughter that nite. Assad never learned from the mistakes of his father, so, like father like son, he will have to pay the price, and to hell how the Russians think about it. They are backing a rogue government, which is a poor investment.