[Legendary] Gallows + New Ability: Letter of the Marque

[Captain Jack]

What with the inactives though? Farming the cards of inactives sounds TOO powerful and a bad business plan for the game longevity. And what defense can we give to the Pirate if we are to allow artificial hostility?

It's the Gallows! People should be given option to avoid them! If they brought it to themselves... oh well...

Another thing we could do, is to allow Hostility to raise up to 150 max with Urban Legends then require 200 or more Hostility for the Gallows. Or fine tune these numbers anyway.

[Donald Trump]

I 100% agree with the admin. Sorry Haron, your dreams of farming BigTea are irrational.

Imagining returning and your chest is 5k cards less than before.

[Haron]

I agree with the inactive problem. I still don't think this card is worth sacrificing hostile natives for. Hostile natives has some nice uses.

I think something else should be done to fix the inactive problem. Not that it's a HUGE problem, as the good cards of the good targets will be stolen fast, and some may even decide to clear this off an inactive target to place their own gallows card there.

[Mugiwara]

The hostility mark should be Based on current top nations top 10 hostility list players average number.

I agree with the inactive problem. I still don't think this card is worth sacrificing hostile natives for. Hostile natives has some nice uses.

I think something else should be done to fix the inactive problem. Not that it's a HUGE problem, as the good cards of the good targets will be stolen fast, and some may even decide to clear this off an inactive target to place their own gallows card there.

This cards usage based on Letter of the Marque. For inactives there could be a rule like if inactive player have debt to a nation. That nation can target inactive player as a enemy of state.

[Captain Jack]

HNs are not required.Do you mean FoJ?

[Captain Jack]

The hostility mark should be Based on current top nations top 10 hostility list players average number.

I disagree. Why other nations should matter if you have someone after your own nation? You need a good way to spend your piles of gold anyhow and what is better than unleashing a horde of privateers against him? How else will you take him to the Gallows?

[Mugiwara]

The hostility mark should be Based on current top nations top 10 hostility list players average number.

I disagree. Why other nations should matter if you have someone after your own nation? You need a good way to spend your piles of gold anyhow and what is better than unleashing a horde of privateers against him? How else will you take him to the Gallows?

I agree with you. i made a calculation its not wise to set an average amount for hostility. Mostly a few player can be targeted due to their immense hostility amounts against a nation. i pull back my suggestion about average hostility count.

[Maha]

can be used when the player has been on the top 10 list four 4 constructive days; Urbans get a restriction that they last for a day and after that the artificial hostility drops back. a player can only receive 4 urbans per four days. this safeguards the natural hostility norm and let the urban mostly intact

[Grimrock Litless]

+1