Dropping fleet danger

Anything related to in-game diplomacy (and beyond) can be brought here.
Guild news and announcements, war declarations, recruitment, military service offerings, etc.

Flaming is expected here. If you are easily offended, avoid this thread all together.

Is this danger manipulation?

Yes
15
71%
No
6
29%
 
Total votes : 21

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:24 pm

So Chall...if a week had pass and you have 10 commandeer and you lost 10 sotl (the person is yet to fleet them;highly unlikeable) would you commandeer them back?
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby ChaIbaud » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:24 pm

trick question i would never have 10 sotl out..
PM me any complaints (10M gold coin wire fee is mandatory).
User avatar
ChaIbaud
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:24 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:26 pm

I said "if".
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Grimrock Litless » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:27 pm

Ferdinand wrote:It's quite a cowardly move. I could understand sabotaging an enemy by giving them a ship (without their knowledge of it) and then ravaging it or something, but this move is just dumb. You lose fame/gold/voodoo instead of just fame/gold if you keep your fleets up on the board.


You will lose the danger on the fleet and save you from getting attacked, which will safe u a lot of lost.
"Got ya."
User avatar
Grimrock Litless
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:50 pm
Location: Under the sea, in a submarine!

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Admiral Nelson » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:30 pm

For those that do not understand this strategy:

> When a fleet has high danger to me above 1000, but to you guys above 500. You know there is no desire/hope of getting such ships inside the fleet back.

> Instead of seeing it taken one night which players often brag about, you drop your gold coins.

> This strategy has been used by many, Roberts and Jack Aubrey/Henry Avery did this several times in times of war, and general danger - On sloop ships and even Frigate fleets at one point, but to my "knowledge" Roberts never commandeered them back, or dropped it to a certain point ( Less then 50,000 ) Henry Avery did drop his gold coins to lose the ships though. In fact, Roberts stole Henry Avery's strategy at best, it be a smart strategy.

Should this/is this be against the rules?
I believe, it is against the rules as you are attempting Danger Manipulation in its finest sort - Removing danger manipulation which should only be done players by you do not know.

Should this be against the rules, to a certain extent not to the extent of re-capturing your fleet just so you can do the same again. The idea of having a fleet lost is down to punishment or Piracy, of which if you do this to yourself it really defeats the purpose of losing one, no?

However, there is nothing really you can do, except report such possible battles. As the Admin can not put ban on players so they can not go below 50,000 well he can - But, it would not be fair to new players nor us as pirates, down to one player we all get punished, savvy?

Wait, that could be a punishment.

Players known to do this can not withdraw to less then 50,000 at a sudden time.
Last edited by Admiral Nelson on Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Admiral Nelson
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:48 am

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Grimrock Litless » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:33 pm

Back in my days, robert told me he did this, never really cared.
"Got ya."
User avatar
Grimrock Litless
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:50 pm
Location: Under the sea, in a submarine!

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Admiral Nelson » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:35 pm

Guluere wrote:Back in my days, robert told me he did this, never really cared.


Which is why I said, dear Guluere he did it several times.

Analyse the text a bit more, mate.

Above post edited.

A punishment could be made.
User avatar
Admiral Nelson
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:48 am

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby ChaIbaud » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:44 pm

Guluere isn't exactly known for being very smart and analytical
PM me any complaints (10M gold coin wire fee is mandatory).
User avatar
ChaIbaud
 
Posts: 1749
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:24 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:46 pm

:lol:
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:48 pm

Anyways this was a year ago I have no intentions of doing this again unless CJ says it's ok. But I/we were just making use of the resources available.

Would be said to die knowing you didn't do all you could.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

PreviousNext

Return to Union of Honor

cron