Stan Rogers wrote:Feniks +100 for facts
Deznutz= zero for deflection
Doesn't matter. We have no recourse.
Nothing will change
Stan Rogers wrote:Feniks +100 for facts
Deznutz= zero for deflection
sXs wrote:Stan Rogers wrote:Feniks +100 for facts
Deznutz= zero for deflection
Doesn't matter. We have no recourse.
Nothing will change
sXs wrote:First of all I did not write the suggestion, someone else is the author of this thread.
sXs wrote:DezNutz wrote:So because you honestly never look at the tags, we should come up with a new feature/setup/conveyance, even though the game already provides the information openly for all to see.
As for the wiki, I simply provided where to find the link in game as well as the direct url. I'm not sure why you are trying to make some kind of argument out of it.
And to address why the wiki link is located where it is, the original intent was to have the wiki replace the "Help" at the bottom of the screen once the wiki was more complete. As the wiki is far from being sufficient to replace the Help, the link was placed only inside the Help page.
While I have been playing this game for years, you are assuming that I remember where everything is at and that I think that everyone else should also know. I've had to ask where links are located recently. I'm not against suggestions of improvement or helping those that need it.
However, when the suggestion being made is clearly already displayed openly right next to the referenced point, not hidden away in some back corner via multiple layers of pages and links, then yes I will treat it the same as someone making an "easy button" suggestion.
Would you please get the **** over yourself and read it for what it is. It was a suggestion made in good faith to try and help solve an issue that has been identified by the community. If you don't like it fine, but there is no reason for the damn condescending replies.
I made the suggestion in good faith after private discussions with a few people. I gave the reasoning for it and the reasoning is valid. Now I understand as your role as a representative of Administration of this game, you may see it as trivial, but the least you could do is act in a professional manner AS A REP of Administration and not put down the people trying to help solve the issue.
Maybe this is exactly why we are in this place to begin with. If your response and attitude are indicative of the response to an issue the players themselves have identified.... then the playerbase is absolutely correct in having no faith whatsoever in any sort of change ever happening becausew the ALL POWERFUL Dez said so.
sXs wrote:DezNutz wrote:So because you honestly never look at the tags, we should come up with a new feature/setup/conveyance, even though the game already provides the information openly for all to see.
As for the wiki, I simply provided where to find the link in game as well as the direct url. I'm not sure why you are trying to make some kind of argument out of it.
And to address why the wiki link is located where it is, the original intent was to have the wiki replace the "Help" at the bottom of the screen once the wiki was more complete. As the wiki is far from being sufficient to replace the Help, the link was placed only inside the Help page.
While I have been playing this game for years, you are assuming that I remember where everything is at and that I think that everyone else should also know. I've had to ask where links are located recently. I'm not against suggestions of improvement or helping those that need it.
However, when the suggestion being made is clearly already displayed openly right next to the referenced point, not hidden away in some back corner via multiple layers of pages and links, then yes I will treat it the same as someone making an "easy button" suggestion.
Would you please get the **** over yourself and read it for what it is. It was a suggestion made in good faith to try and help solve an issue that has been identified by the community. If you don't like it fine, but there is no reason for the damn condescending replies.
I made the suggestion in good faith after private discussions with a few people. I gave the reasoning for it and the reasoning is valid. Now I understand as your role as a representative of Administration of this game, you may see it as trivial, but the least you could do is act in a professional manner AS A REP of Administration and not put down the people trying to help solve the issue.
Maybe this is exactly why we are in this place to begin with. If your response and attitude are indicative of the response to an issue the players themselves have identified.... then the playerbase is absolutely correct in having no faith whatsoever in any sort of change ever happening becausew the ALL POWERFUL Dez said so.
sXs wrote:Stan Rogers wrote:Feniks +100 for facts
Deznutz= zero for deflection
Doesn't matter. We have no recourse.
Nothing will change
DezNutz wrote:
If your expecting me to just give into demands and half-baked ideas all in the name of increasing forum activity and community cooperation, you thought wrong. As I wouldn't be doing the task asked of me if I was not overly critical of everything that passed through development. Come up with something better and more thought out than your Point 5.
Stan Rogers wrote:DezNutz wrote:
If your expecting me to just give into demands and half-baked ideas all in the name of increasing forum activity and community cooperation, you thought wrong. As I wouldn't be doing the task asked of me if I was not overly critical of everything that passed through development. Come up with something better and more thought out than your Point 5.
And this is why I think you make a good game development co-ordinator but a lousy forum mod.
Get out while you retain your dignity. Someone with less bias will fill the position.
No, I do not want the job as it would cause too much turmoil with other players who would seek to disrupt the whole applecart however, I am confidant the position will be taken over by someone more qualified.