Typical response from activists. "I am right and not open to any other opinion no matter what the facts say, so I am going to take my ball and go home."
Surprised you didn't call me a racist.
DezNutz wrote:PlagueDoctor wrote:Every conspiracy pretty much has the "FAKE NEWS. Don't trust what they tell you, but research for yourself" in it. Its a nice give-away for how serious the following scientific statement that follows that statement
....
Global Warming/Climate Change is at best a theory and not a very good one at that. Theory is not fact. The fact that they have to regularly change their model to fit observed data shows that their theory is not fact. For example. The previous Climate Model predicted that there should have been a significant increase in temperature. The prediction was made using a model that used a cherry picked set of data to make that conclusion. Low and behold, the prediction was wrong. Instead of looking at the full data and redrawing a hypothesis on that data, they set forth to adjust the model so that the model fell in line with the preset conclusion. That's not science.
PlagueDoctor wrote:DezNutz wrote:PlagueDoctor wrote:Every conspiracy pretty much has the "FAKE NEWS. Don't trust what they tell you, but research for yourself" in it. Its a nice give-away for how serious the following scientific statement that follows that statement
....
Global Warming/Climate Change is at best a theory and not a very good one at that. Theory is not fact. The fact that they have to regularly change their model to fit observed data shows that their theory is not fact. For example. The previous Climate Model predicted that there should have been a significant increase in temperature. The prediction was made using a model that used a cherry picked set of data to make that conclusion. Low and behold, the prediction was wrong. Instead of looking at the full data and redrawing a hypothesis on that data, they set forth to adjust the model so that the model fell in line with the preset conclusion. That's not science.
Thats could of course be correct.
It would probably be a better approach to, when you dont agree with a massively complex scientific issue where over 90% of the scientists whose expertise this is agree with the general conclusions, to think "what am i missing or what do i not understand"...instead of "everyone else is an idiot."
Just a suggestion
Meliva wrote:Honestly, I'm not too worried about the earth. I'm fairly confident that, unless we straight up blow it up, no damage we do to it will be permanent. Given enough time, It will bounce back, along with new life. That being said, I honestly fully expect that sooner or later, we will be bringing ourselves into extinction. Either by destroying our environment to the point we can no longer survive in it, or just wiping ourselves out with nukes, or some other stupid mistake.
Course, once we wipe ourselves out, that just makes it all the more easy for earth to recover from all the things we've done to it. Then far into the future, if new sentient life pops up, or aliens visit, maybe they will see our ruins and learn from it.
Thankfully, I don't see ourselves going extinct in this lifetime, barring nuclear war or some other massive unforeseen event, so enjoy life while you can folks