Battle Strategies

All disapproved suggestions or suggestions that refer to disapproved suggestion can be found here.

Battle Strategies

Postby Magefultz » Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:27 pm

I don't know if this has been brought up before. What about a officer or building that allows you to know what are the chances of winning a battle.
Eat Pie Get Fat And Happy
User avatar
Magefultz
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:46 pm

Re: Battle Strategies

Postby Brazzler » Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:42 am

I'm on the fence with this idea. It would be useful for yourself to attack others. But... I have lost count the number of times others have thought they could beat my fleets and then find out the hard way that they are stacked.
If you didn't want your ass shot off, you shouldn't have stuck it out so far.
User avatar
Brazzler
 
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:37 am

Re: Battle Strategies

Postby Magefultz » Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:35 am

it could as be use as a bonuses with being attacked and defending.
Eat Pie Get Fat And Happy
User avatar
Magefultz
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:46 pm

Re: Battle Strategies

Postby Hawk » Sun Nov 18, 2018 12:46 am

Vote to discussion

Edit: -1 Disapprove
"Have at it gentlemen"
User avatar
Hawk
Players Dev Team Member
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:32 am

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby DezNutz » Sun Nov 18, 2018 1:53 am

I'm unsure of this.

I think going into the unknown during a battle is a good thing. When you battle a player, you don't know what techs they have or voodoo active (in most cases), or the attributes on their ships. That's what makes it interesting. I've won and lost battles, where the outcome was unexpected. I don't think we should clue into the potential outcomes.
I'm only here for Game Development and Forum Moderation.

If you see a forum rule violation, report the post.
User avatar
DezNutz
Players Dev Team Coordinator
 
Posts: 7074
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby PFH » Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:57 pm

I say discussion as more detail is needed and more player input for this

Edit: i have thought more about this and say -1 and disapprove
Evil Teddy Bear :P
User avatar
PFH
 
Posts: 3249
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:48 pm

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby Shadowood » Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:43 pm

-1

A player should know their capabilities before they attack. If they attack and fail it is on them. There is even voodoo that can aid in winning a battle by making your fleets stronger.
I don't fear death. I look forward to it with great anticipation. For then I will met God face to face and let him know that I stole his Man of War!!!
User avatar
Shadowood
Fantasy Draft Deity
 
Posts: 4080
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 5:40 am

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby PFH » Wed Nov 21, 2018 6:35 pm

Bump for review
Evil Teddy Bear :P
User avatar
PFH
 
Posts: 3249
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:48 pm

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby Banger » Thu Nov 22, 2018 7:49 pm

-1, disapprove. I think there should always be some unknown to the exact results of a battle.
User avatar
Banger
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:00 pm

Re: [Review] Battle Strategies

Postby PFH » Thu Nov 22, 2018 9:00 pm

Changing my vote to -1.
Evil Teddy Bear :P
User avatar
PFH
 
Posts: 3249
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:48 pm


Return to Disapproved

cron