Flotsam - Jetsam

[Dejanira]

+1 to the whole idea, even if I think that the Scavenger card is a bit too weak. Or, at least, I woudn't invest 3 turns for 250 crates only, not even hoping in the luck they'd be 250 Goldbars (too low chances of success, assuming the chances would be 1/8 for each resource).
I'd leave Goldbars out as they don't float like wood, but at the same time I'd increase the number of crates found.

[sXs]

+1 to the whole idea, even if I think that the Scavenger card is a bit too weak. Or, at least, I woudn't invest 3 turns for 250 crates only, not even hoping in the luck they'd be 250 Goldbars (too low chances of success).
I'd leave Goldbars out as they don't float like wood, but at the same time I'd increase the number of crates found.

I agree. 250 crates for 3 turns would make it fairly inconsequential. Boost the turns back to 8 and have it apply to all fleets of a captain maybe?

[Shadowood]

I agree. 250 crates for 3 turns would make it fairly inconsequential. Boost the turns back to 8 and have it apply to all fleets of a captain maybe?

FLEETS? No this is items lost at sea after a battle or a Leviathan pokes a hole in your deck.

Considering it a Common Card and semi similar to Iron Golem, I don't know if the turns or crates are out of line. Perhaps an increase to more crates, but not sure on that yet.

[Shadowood]

Bump for Clockwork

[Lachlan]

sounds good but more crates

[Hawk]

-1 Disapproved

[Shadowood]

With the addition to "Scraps" when a ship loses a level, I too don't see a big need for this.

[DezNutz]

With the addition to "Scraps" when a ship loses a level, I too don't see a big need for this.

I think CJ snuffed you. He was probably like, Shadowood has a good idea here, let me come up with an alternative approach and make his suggestion worthless.




Disapproved.

[Vane]

Disapproved due to irrelevance now with current mechanics and voodoo.

[PFH]

Disapprove