chal wrote:It is true you have never complained, PK, at least openly, about these attacks but members speaking on your behalf sure do include you in their threats, speaking of how the entirety of your guild is fed up.
Feniks wrote:chal wrote:It is true you have never complained, PK, at least openly, about these attacks but members speaking on your behalf sure do include you in their threats, speaking of how the entirety of your guild is fed up.
Sorry Phoenix, but this is 100% accurate. You aren't seen as a "trainer" but more as a protector. Even when "the one whose name i will not speak" was in SSAA, his first response was to threaten us with your name.
Much respect, but there is a difference.
Feniks wrote:chal wrote:It is true you have never complained, PK, at least openly, about these attacks but members speaking on your behalf sure do include you in their threats, speaking of how the entirety of your guild is fed up.
Sorry Phoenix, but this is 100% accurate. You aren't seen as a "trainer" but more as a protector. Even when "the one whose name i will not speak" was in SSAA, his first response was to threaten us with your name.
Much respect, but there is a difference.
DezNutz wrote:Feniks wrote:chal wrote:It is true you have never complained, PK, at least openly, about these attacks but members speaking on your behalf sure do include you in their threats, speaking of how the entirety of your guild is fed up.
Sorry Phoenix, but this is 100% accurate. You aren't seen as a "trainer" but more as a protector. Even when "the one whose name i will not speak" was in SSAA, his first response was to threaten us with your name.
Much respect, but there is a difference.
He is talking about Notsosmart.