Wolfie's Complaint Board

[sXs]

I would start one for no g.c. in return. Yes

Fine then lets ask CJ to remove any reward from it with same conditions....

OI would agree to that until both sides are equal.

Remember though attackers bear more risk, so rewards go with risk. As long as both sides reward is equal to the risk they are taking then I am completely fine with removing the reward for a trial period.

[Sebena]

Last time I checked you weren't named Shadowood.

Then why you don't return people their ships when you plunder them or gold when you take it. Sending payment and credits is also gameplay mechanic

Actually in some cases I have. In fact, I have several times. A new player has a sotl tail with little gold on hand. I will hit it as anyone who plays like I do does. In a few cases I have sold the SOTL on the market and sent that player credits with an explanation of what happened and what he needs to do in the future to avoid it. I did that with 2 Ravenlocke members and contacted Sparrow and the player I hit to explain.

This is exactly how I learned. It is actually the best way to learn.

You make me out to be a cold hearted a@@hole, but none of it is personal. It is a game. I help anyone who asks without asking for compensation. I expect retaliation for some of my actions, and 99% of the time I welcome it. That 1% comes when the retaliation is so over the top that even an outsider would agree it went too far.

Really riding players constantly and costing them hundreds millions is ok as long as that target hits back on plunder and takes few K's of gold. But when they use voodoo to retaliate all hell break loose and they need to be destroyed and forced out of the game. And don't start with stupid reasons about them being weak for quitting. Would you switch job if you were bullied each day and you know that it will continue as long as those don't retire or die or you would seek new job?

[Sebena]

I would start one for no g.c. in return. Yes

Fine then lets ask CJ to remove any reward from it with same conditions....

OI would agree to that until both sides are equal.

Remember though attackers bear more risk, so rewards go with risk. As long as both sides reward is equal to the risk they are taking then I am completely fine with removing the reward for a trial period.

Nope I disagree let th defenders get reward and attacer gets fame and glory since you seek it or even better attacker should get honor point it should be sufficant reward for them.

[Shadowood]

I think I see an “Opportunity”.. Here, hold my beer

[DezNutz]

I too am an Opportunist. To call me otherwise, is not...wise.

A selective opportunist.

An true opportunist takes advantage of every opportunity that comes there way, regardless of the costs or how it would effect them or others.

Do you have evidence that I have not taken advantage of every opportunity that has come my way?

Yes. 3 idiots made payouts from the USA Treasury in the amounts of 250M gc each. From my understanding, VUDU and quite a few other players were aware of the payments. Could have stolen quite a bit of gc easily, but from what I heard they didn't get hit.

[Banger]

A selective opportunist.

An true opportunist takes advantage of every opportunity that comes there way, regardless of the costs or how it would effect them or others.

Do you have evidence that I have not taken advantage of every opportunity that has come my way?

Yes. 3 idiots made payouts from the USA Treasury in the amounts of 250M gc each. From my understanding, VUDU and quite a few other players were aware of the payments. Could have stolen quite a bit of gc easily, but from what I heard they didn't get hit.

That was a very marginal opportunity as all the recipients were online and had cc's and mb up. The real opportunity is when dozer gets a payout from Bermuda and is on the demographics page carrying 100 million plus for a couple hours.

[Shadowood]

Yes. 3 idiots made payouts from the USA Treasury in the amounts of 250M gc each. From my understanding, VUDU and quite a few other players were aware of the payments. Could have stolen quite a bit of gc easily, but from what I heard they didn't get hit.

Oh yeah. Those peeps did approach several people in their attempt to over throw the treasury. Sadly I had other 'opportunities' I was focusing on or I would have. You can only be in so many places at once you know.

[DezNutz]

Yes. 3 idiots made payouts from the USA Treasury in the amounts of 250M gc each. From my understanding, VUDU and quite a few other players were aware of the payments. Could have stolen quite a bit of gc easily, but from what I heard they didn't get hit.

Oh yeah. Those peeps did approach several people in their attempt to over throw the treasury. Sadly I had other 'opportunities' I was focusing on or I would have. You can only be in so many places at once you know.

See selective opportunist.

[Sebena]

Amazing how childrens are allowed in this game when they still go in kindergarden.

[Shadowood]

Yes. 3 idiots made payouts from the USA Treasury in the amounts of 250M gc each. From my understanding, VUDU and quite a few other players were aware of the payments. Could have stolen quite a bit of gc easily, but from what I heard they didn't get hit.

Oh yeah. Those peeps did approach several people in their attempt to over throw the treasury. Sadly I had other 'opportunities' I was focusing on or I would have. You can only be in so many places at once you know.

See selective opportunist.

LOL!

So, if your right hand is holding onto a bag full of 1 million dollars over a cliff and your left hand is holding onto a bag with 2 million dollars over the same cliff, and someone throws you a waded up $10 bill... You would drop one of the bags because...you know.. Opportunity.