Wolfie's Complaint Board

[Shadowood]

[Sebena]

I posted a meme to support my argument and to poke fun at you.

Quisque suorem verborum optimus interpres


I see it as a failed try to cover that you have no more facts to support your words

[Dmanwuzhere]

+1

[Shadowood]

I posted a meme to support my argument and to poke fun at you.

Quisque suorem verborum optimus interpres


I see it as a failed try to cover that you have no more facts to support your words

I support the game and I support change. The features that ADMIN and Players have come up with are great. Now I will agree that some items need some tweaking. Even current items. Is Blockades good to go as suggested by ADMIN? Admin believes they are and I would be happy to test version 1.0 out both on Offense and Defensive sides.

You speak of the failed Witch Hut idea. Yes I supported the idea and still do. With the right balance it would be an additional feature in the game to make it even better.

I was not here back in the old days before there was no HIDEOUT. Before there was no Goldsmith, Bank, Marina, etc. But all those new additions have made the game what it is today. Progress is good. Progress is needed. Without it things get stale.

The items that ADMIN have in the hopper will make the game even better. Blockades, Plantations, Flagship, etc.. I for one am excited to see them all happen and will assist, as many others do, in ideas to make sure they are fair and balanced.

For others who instantly throw up their arms in disagreement before an idea is even implemented I see as short sited. I don't think ADMIN would release something that would throw the game balance so off course that players would leave the game. Thats not in their best interest. I love the fact that they do listen to the player base, but ultimately it is their decision on the course they want to take the game.

[Sebena]

I posted a meme to support my argument and to poke fun at you.

Quisque suorem verborum optimus interpres


I see it as a failed try to cover that you have no more facts to support your words

I support the game and I support change. The features that ADMIN and Players have come up with are great. Now I will agree that some items need some tweaking. Even current items. Is Blockades good to go as suggested by ADMIN? Admin believes they are and I would be happy to test version 1.0 out both on Offense and Defensive sides.

You speak of the failed Witch Hut idea. Yes I supported the idea and still do. With the right balance it would be an additional feature in the game to make it even better.

I was not here back in the old days before there was no HIDEOUT. Before there was no Goldsmith, Bank, Marina, etc. But all those new additions have made the game what it is today. Progress is good. Progress is needed. Without it things get stale.

The items that ADMIN have in the hopper will make the game even better. Blockades, Plantations, Flagship, etc.. I for one am excited to see them all happen and will assist, as many others do, in ideas to make sure they are fair and balanced.

For others who instantly throw up their arms in disagreement before an idea is even implemented I see as short sited. I don't think ADMIN would release something that would throw the game balance so off course that players would leave the game. Thats not in their best interest. I love the fact that they do listen to the player base, but ultimately it is their decision on the course they want to take the game.

I support chages but not if they are unbalanced. Witch hut failed because players shot down any counters which were proposed. Back then question was asked will legendary cards be removable by serenity and purify people said no. Then proposition of legendary serenity and purify to fight same those legendary cards was shot down saying it is plain stupid and just recycling cards. Other things in similiar way were proposed and they were shot down aswell.

Do I want for game to progress yes I do but not if it is not balanced. Pirates complained before game is not balanced and favors merchants only and it was called merchant glory zillion times. Now we are on the opposite situation game favors pirates more than merchants. MAin argument is merchants make millions a day. Pirates can make even more millions if hey know how to play. What I want is that this becomes balanced game I tought blockades will be good step twoards it but it is not in curnent format. it favors attacker more than defenders. So I wonder would you start blockade in this format even if attacker doesnt get 1 gc from it it just get honor points or like you says fame and glory?

[sXs]

Quisque suorem verborum optimus interpres


I see it as a failed try to cover that you have no more facts to support your words

I support the game and I support change. The features that ADMIN and Players have come up with are great. Now I will agree that some items need some tweaking. Even current items. Is Blockades good to go as suggested by ADMIN? Admin believes they are and I would be happy to test version 1.0 out both on Offense and Defensive sides.

You speak of the failed Witch Hut idea. Yes I supported the idea and still do. With the right balance it would be an additional feature in the game to make it even better.

I was not here back in the old days before there was no HIDEOUT. Before there was no Goldsmith, Bank, Marina, etc. But all those new additions have made the game what it is today. Progress is good. Progress is needed. Without it things get stale.

The items that ADMIN have in the hopper will make the game even better. Blockades, Plantations, Flagship, etc.. I for one am excited to see them all happen and will assist, as many others do, in ideas to make sure they are fair and balanced.

For others who instantly throw up their arms in disagreement before an idea is even implemented I see as short sited. I don't think ADMIN would release something that would throw the game balance so off course that players would leave the game. Thats not in their best interest. I love the fact that they do listen to the player base, but ultimately it is their decision on the course they want to take the game.

I support chages but not if they are unbalanced. Witch hut failed because players shot down any counters which were proposed. Back then question was asked will legendary cards be removable by serenity and purify people said no. Then proposition of legendary serenity and purify to fight same those legendary cards was shot down saying it is plain stupid and just recycling cards. Other things in similiar way were proposed and they were shot down aswell.

Do I want for game to progress yes I do but not if it is not balanced. Pirates complained before game is not balanced and favors merchants only and it was called merchant glory zillion times. Now we are on the opposite situation game favors pirates more than merchants. MAin argument is merchants make millions a day. Pirates can make even more millions if hey know how to play. What I want is that this becomes balanced game I tought blockades will be good step twoards it but it is not in curnent format. it favors attacker more than defenders. So I wonder would you start blockade in this format even if attacker doesnt get 1 gc from it it just get honor points or like you says fame and glory?

I would. It is just another gameplay mechanic.

[Sebena]

Last time I checked you weren't named Shadowood.

Then why you don't return people their ships when you plunder them or gold when you take it. Sending payment and credits is also gameplay mechanic

[Shadowood]

I would start one for no g.c. in return. Yes

[Sebena]

I would start one for no g.c. in return. Yes

Fine then lets ask CJ to remove any reward from it with same conditions....

[sXs]

Last time I checked you weren't named Shadowood.

Then why you don't return people their ships when you plunder them or gold when you take it. Sending payment and credits is also gameplay mechanic

Actually in some cases I have. In fact, I have several times. A new player has a sotl tail with little gold on hand. I will hit it as anyone who plays like I do does. In a few cases I have sold the SOTL on the market and sent that player credits with an explanation of what happened and what he needs to do in the future to avoid it. I did that with 2 Ravenlocke members and contacted Sparrow and the player I hit to explain.

This is exactly how I learned. It is actually the best way to learn.

You make me out to be a cold hearted a@@hole, but none of it is personal. It is a game. I help anyone who asks without asking for compensation. I expect retaliation for some of my actions, and 99% of the time I welcome it. That 1% comes when the retaliation is so over the top that even an outsider would agree it went too far.