Deadking's Woes.

by **Banger** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:26 pm

Thanks for the ships.

by **Admiral Nelson** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:32 pm

I think I knew 80% of the games mechanics until the Hideout Technologies came out...

Now its 50-60%... So to know your 90% as Deznuts states you must be a Administrator or a IQ that matches how much bullshit you come out with.

by **OG Deadking** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:37 pm

Okay maybe 20% now, but it depends on what type of game mechanics

by **Bmw** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:38 pm

Deadhits gaming yt wrote:Okay maybe 20% now, but it depends on what type of game mechanics

I was going to say that you know less then 2% of the mechanics.

by **OG Deadking** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:41 pm

DoS wrote:
Grimrock Litless wrote:
DoS wrote:He who know he mechanics know he must not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

It's actually fine to leave it at level 4 for trade ships as long as you remember to relevel them when they get deleveled, if it's his war fleet, well, its his fault.

He who know he mechanics know he must not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

he mechanics know he must not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

know he must not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

war fleet tail at level 4.

it was level 10 but got de leveled while I was afk

by **Bmw** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:41 pm

it got deleveled days before the battle started not minutes

by **Haron** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:45 pm

Giving a player's understanding of the rules in terms of percentage makes relatively little sense, in my opinion. How would you measure that? My issue was with a claim of understanding 100 %. That is a statement which DOES make sense, and is easy to falsify.

Remember that there are lots of rules which everyone knows and understands, without even thinking about them.

by **OG Deadking** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:46 pm

DoS wrote:He who know he mechanics know he must not keep he war fleet tail at level 4.

105 ship plunder of tail ship if I'm right

by **Bmw** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:49 pm

Haron wrote:Giving a player's understanding of the rules in terms of percentage makes relatively little sense, in my opinion. How would you measure that? My issue was with a claim of understanding 100 %. That is a statement which DOES make sense, and is easy to falsify.

Remember that there are lots of rules which everyone knows and understands, without even thinking about them.

yet there are some people who don't know those rules.

by **OG Deadking** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:53 pm

Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.

Re: Deadking's Woes.