Next version of Pirates Glory (ideas discussion)

Old Discussion topics

Next version of Pirates Glory (ideas discussion)

Postby Xepshunall » Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:27 pm

Proximity+DR=Plunder-able.

I, and a couple others I spoke to, believe that having to be docked in order to fight has a huge negative impact on the realism of this game. It also creates the need for DR to be the only deciding factor to determine who can be plundered. I suggested this elsewhere and didn't get a response so here I go again.

The map could be made up of grid coordinates just like it is in reality. Distance could be the main deciding factor for whether a player can be targeted. If the potential target fleet has on 1 Danger point, the distance would have to be shorter and at 2 Danger it could be longer. For 3 danger, distance is unrealistic but not nearly so much as it is right now. We don't generally have battles for the benefit of the spectators in the ports so the plunder button should be located in the screen of a specific fleet and that fleet would be the one used to plunder. There's no need to eliminate the existing DR=Plunder-able method when it comes to port battles and the Port Battles report could still include attacks made in the area of that port. It is still extremely far fetched that my fleet conducting its unload/load in Tzogos should be targeted by a fleet in Tortuga just because it will eventually get there. Maybe if it were on the 25% of the route that is closest to the port of the attacking fleet, it could be targeted provided the situation still exists by the time the attacker chooses his target and attack fleets. A fleet pausing its trade route to compensate for speed would increase the length of its vulnerability time in the port it takes its break while reducing the amount of time they are in danger at a different port along their route. This could be further exaggerated by using max crew to move into and out of a port as fast as possible which would require an even longer pause wherever it is taken.
Yesterday I gave my all. Today I'll give more. Tomorrow, I'll take back what you took for granted.
User avatar
Xepshunall
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:13 pm

Next version of Pirates Glory (ideas discussion)

Postby Xepshunall » Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:38 pm

We should have better uses for credits than to destroy huge numbers of our enemies' fleets. Less voodoo that targets fleets and ships and more that targets hideouts, factories, banks and such other buildings as might exist would be more of an annoyance and less of a game breaker.
Yesterday I gave my all. Today I'll give more. Tomorrow, I'll take back what you took for granted.
User avatar
Xepshunall
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:13 pm

Next version of Pirates Glory (ideas discussion)

Postby Xepshunall » Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:43 pm

Please try to keep focus when you consider why pirates need merchants. As it stands, the only players with a good chance of prosperity are those who were once great merchants but switched to being combatants.
Yesterday I gave my all. Today I'll give more. Tomorrow, I'll take back what you took for granted.
User avatar
Xepshunall
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:13 pm


Return to Archives