Bmw wrote:or we could do what i suggested and have 5 of them that are random active players (the winners go on and every sixth month those are the one's that get the rewards) and the winners dont get to be on the list again for a year or so if there still active
I like the idea of mixing it up and mixing people in but not of excluding people for being good. I think the essence of what you are getting at is to keep someone from continually dominating or winning and that I agree with. I am just unsure how exactly to make that happen