Port Gossip Improvement

[Admiral Nelson]

Maybe me not be clear enough, how will it function in terms of the Plunder page Next and previous?

Will it just skip to the next port that there is a fleet in?

Or will it go across all 21 ports, give the display for no fleets in port until you have a fleet in a port?

[Donald Trump]

For Plunder? This is not a suggestion to improve that. This is strictly for port gossip, which can be viewed regardless of a fleet inside the port or not.

[Admiral Nelson]

For Plunder? This is not a suggestion to improve that. This is strictly for port gossip, which can be viewed regardless of a fleet inside the port or not.

I am in response to Williams suggestion, based inside the thread.

Do not shoot the messenger.

[Maha]

i made the plunder suggestion here: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2742

the plunder topic could continue there

[William one eye]

Maybe me not be clear enough, how will it function in terms of the Plunder page Next and previous?

Will it just skip to the next port that there is a fleet in?

Or will it go across all 21 ports, give the display for no fleets in port until you have a fleet in a port?

It was Maha's Idea.


I assume if implemented you would just get the - You cannot start any plundering without at least one fleet in port! message.
Although It would be really useful if it just skipped to the ports where you had fleets present.
I would find it useful either way.

[Captain Jack]

Also, a dropdown list with all Port names (And links) to both pages.

Approved

[Captain dungeness]

Also, a dropdown list with all Port names (And links) to both pages.

Approved

Yes! Brilliant