I pulled out of making loans a while back, feeling there was a very poor return rate on them, given the persistent fail rate. A few weeks back, I decided to try again : so I made a point of offering new players reasonable rates for small loans : all told, I made 33 loans : to date, 7 have defaulted and 2 more look like they are heading the same way. That 9 out of 33, which is pretty poor going indeed.
Now, it can be argued my nation loan insurance has paid out, which is true, but not the full amount due : and why should it? None of the defaulters were in my nation, so why should it have to subsidise loans to them? Whatever, it would seem that to continue to offer such loans will have to be put under the 'public service' heading, a loss borne for the good of the game. But why should bankers do that?
I know the devs wish the banks to play such a role in helping new players to get started but again, why should they have to bear that risk of expense? Where are the great earnings to be found for bankers? Credit exchanges? After spending several billion levelling up the bank, you too can dip your toes in those waters, but looking at the paucity of trades on offer from those banks that are qualified, the credit exchange notion is a bit of a dead duck and hardly justifies spending a million in its pursuit, never mind a billion. Frankly, if my bank ever gets to level10 its because I need the space to store my own gold, no other reason seems to be profitable in any way.
I think, if the devs want the banks to help fund new players out of their own pocket, then the banks will need some form of income to support that without having to spend those billions to play at the top end of the sector.