Diplomacy suggestion (Medium)

Here you can find all the ideas/suggestions that have already been approved by administration. These ideas will stay here in queue till they are implemented or... postponed! Feel free to browse through the ideas, add your own ideas and help us prioritize them correctly.

Diplomacy suggestion (Medium)

Postby Haron » Fri Apr 08, 2016 7:16 am

I suggest the following option to a court/government: For a specific port, support a specific nation other than one self. By doing this, the nations influence in that port is added to the supported nations influence for purpose of determining control. So, if nation A has 10 M influence, nation B has 8 M influence and nation C has 3 M influence, nation C could decide to support nation B, giving nation B control over the port. This decision should only be implemented after a vote in the supporting nation.

I think this will make diplomacy and advancing in ones nation more interesting for smaller nations. As it is, only few nations control ports, and the smaller ones have no influence on this. By implementing my suggestion, smaller nations may negotiate with larger ones as to how they use their influence. It will also give an extra dimension to alliances and port control wars.

I realize that I am relatively new to this game, so there may be consequences of this that I do not see yet, but I think this suggestion would make it more interesting to belong to a small nation, instead of changing nationality to one of the larger ones.
The T'zak Ryn offers Naval Combat Solutions for the Quality Conscious Customer
User avatar
Haron
Forum Rambler
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:04 am

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Bmw » Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:38 am

i am relatively new myself but this seems like a good idea
User avatar
Bmw
 
Posts: 1535
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 2:43 am

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Most Lee Harmless » Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:24 am

Excellent thinking : I could see this being part of the 'alliance' thread of diplomacy, along with trade benefits, such use of joint influence would indeed open up many options for smaller nations : it could also form part of the 'vassal' option, where smaller nations could negotiate protection deals with their influence holdings becoming part of the trade-off along with tribute : for example, a smaller 'vassal' nation could reduce any tribute element by offering its influence support instead.
-1 : Move to archive.
User avatar
Most Lee Harmless
 
Posts: 3970
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 3:48 pm

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Sir Sam Lowe » Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:35 am

+1 This is a good idea.
Sir Richard Delrio
User avatar
Sir Sam Lowe
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:34 pm
Location: Delrio Brothers Square,Tzogos,Avonmora

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Hpv4all » Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:47 pm

I admit, I felt like this might be a good idea for getting less powerful nations involved. However, it seems to undermine the reasoning behind port control, tax revenue. Tax revenue should go to the most influential nation not the second. Alliances can be made between nations to overthrow the most influential through other means. I do agree that less influential nations could/should be able to play a bigger role, but not in this way.
User avatar
Hpv4all
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Captain Jack » Fri Apr 08, 2016 2:52 pm

Welcome to the game Haron. Interestingly good suggestion. It must also be a record for getting such a meaningful suggestion at your first post.

I am not sure if you understand this, but this is also a game changer. Perhaps we can do this. I will wait for more user input and some slight tailoring perhaps before I can safely comment on this.

If I got it right, you propose that nations get to choose where their's subject influence is going. Or individuals?
User avatar
Captain Jack
Project Coordinator
 
Posts: 4042
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Pania

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Sebena » Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:02 pm

Like Danik said this could work when they implement diplomacy and that could be part of vassal country.
To confront it alliance between nation should have same but less effect like instead of 100% from vassal nation allied nation can give 20% (numbers are negotinable).. Of course other bonuses are possible with allied nations which aren't with vassal but that's part of the other topic
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”
User avatar
Sebena
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 3:20 pm

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Crackedcubes » Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:20 pm

+1, national influence only.
User avatar
Crackedcubes
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:38 pm

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Haron » Fri Apr 08, 2016 3:33 pm

Thank you, Captain Jack.

To clarify, I suggest that an entire nations influence has to go to one other nation only - not that individuals can give away their influence. Thus giving rise to interesting possible internal conflict inside the nations (the government has to decide through voting). So, for a specific port, Norways entire influence would support one other nation (or none at all).

I do NOT think the supporting nation should get any of the tax revenue. The reasons for support could vary. For instance, maybe two medium sized nations could support each other in two different ports. A small nation could support a large one perhaps for a sum of gold. Or maybe for promise of protection of some sort. Or maybe the larger nation just threathens them to get their support.

At least, that was what I had in mind :-)
The T'zak Ryn offers Naval Combat Solutions for the Quality Conscious Customer
User avatar
Haron
Forum Rambler
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:04 am

Re: Diplomacy suggestion

Postby Dr Vegapunk » Fri Apr 08, 2016 4:01 pm

+1 . like the idea.
one more benefict is both party can enjoy the title bonuses on controlled port.
im fart a lot

Smell ur Own Fart for an Absolute Calmness
User avatar
Dr Vegapunk
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 8:09 am

Next

Return to Approved

cron