by Most Lee Harmless » Mon Jun 22, 2015 9:28 am
Aye, I think my fellow bankers are pretty agreed that some form of fixed term deposit would warrant interest being paid : then we can make lending decisions knowing those funds will be in place over the term of any loan offered. But that's just half the story : we also have to be fairly certain that the loans made using those funds will be repaid on time and in full : as my esteemed colleagues mention, that is not a given by any means. To illustrate : if I make 10 loans of similar size and structure the loans to return to me 10% over their term, then it only needs one of those ten loans to fail to repay and I will have made an overall loss. If I then have to pay interest to depositors on the same sums myself my loss is compounded further. So, to be realistic, I don't really want to be 'borrowing' my depositors funds to be making unsecured loans when it's all, at the moment, far too high-risk for that. Until there are some forms of securing or under-writing loans, then the risk of total loss is being carried by the banker : add further to a banks costs of doing loan business without reducing the banks risks and the maths of offering loans will never add up in a banks favor and I wouldn't trust a banker who thought they could.
I'll agree to interest being paid on 'current' accounts the same day I get the right to close your account and return your funds as 'not needed'. Then you can bury them back in the ground and hope no treasure hunters find them.
-1 : Move to archive.