TRUMP 2020!

[Most Lee Harmless]

Funny how he had four years to fix this issue he claimed existed in 2016 too. Guess he had too many golf rounds to play. Mail in ballots have been around a long time. Instances of fraudxare minimal. Instances of mass fraud are unknown.
Relying on the SC to overturn an election result hardly adds legitimacy to a claim of victory. Its the behaviour of despots and dictators, not of a democractic entity.

If Trump was to gain an overturned election on the grounds of procedural flaws, it just opens the whole can of worms for every other election to be thus contested, from local councillor to president via governors, sheriffs, DA's and school boards. Somewhat a phyrric victory, when a democratic nation distrusts democracy do much it need rely on the lawyers seeking any likely or even unlikely cause or loophole to decide the elections for us.

Ironic, isnt it, the biggest opponent of mail in ballots voted himself by... mail in ballot.

[Dmanwuzhere]

by absentee ballot not mail in ballot there is a difference
and the mail in ballot along with rules made by a non legislative branch came just months before the election not his whole term
but it already haa set a precedent just kick out the dems from the polling locations and run ballots multiple times and cheat away every way you want

i can tell by your argument you know very little about the facts of the arguments
it takes evidence of harm being done for the court to offer a coercive remedy to reach a declaratory remedy just because cnn isnt showing you the evidence doesnt mean its nonexistant

the only question in pa at this point is simple what will be the remedy offered by the courts

i dont see why you are so mad at him golfing its not like obama didnt do it and i thought any sport with dueling clubs and numerous balls on multiple holes would meet your approval

[Mack]

Funny how he had four years to fix this issue he claimed existed in 2016 too. Guess he had too many golf rounds to play. Mail in ballots have been around a long time. Instances of fraudxare minimal. Instances of mass fraud are unknown.
Relying on the SC to overturn an election result hardly adds legitimacy to a claim of victory. Its the behaviour of despots and dictators, not of a democractic entity.

If Trump was to gain an overturned election on the grounds of procedural flaws, it just opens the whole can of worms for every other election to be thus contested, from local councillor to president via governors, sheriffs, DA's and school boards. Somewhat a phyrric victory, when a democratic nation distrusts democracy do much it need rely on the lawyers seeking any likely or even unlikely cause or loophole to decide the elections for us.

Ironic, isnt it, the biggest opponent of mail in ballots voted himself by... mail in ballot.

so its really you youre worried about not accepting the results and paying up, okay why didnt you just say so

and i sure as hell hope everyone from now on is very sceptical of all political races and hope all questionable activity is investigated and not overlooked. every bit

i hope all illegal activity is punished with the max punishment.

i would like to see them do it by the book

[Most Lee Harmless]

Nope. I doubt even one of the hundreds of allegations of fraud will be proven.
I could see a case being won over an interpretation of procedure which may bring a result in Trumps favour in that single case. The election overall is done and dusted.
By the way, a procedural irregularity is not a 'fraud'. That the majority of such allegations are directed at Republican-run electoral bodies makes the 'fraud' allegations even more laughable.
But keep on hoping and dreaming. You got another four years to come up with reasons why your candidate will lose the next election too.

[Mack]

okay whatever you say youre the one to scared to wager fake gold on it

[Most Lee Harmless]

Lol, I am certainly not wasting time making bets with folk who see unicorns. If you have some childish notion that defines 'fear' then back to kindergarten with you, your education proves lacking.

[Mack]

okay you win

[Dmanwuzhere]

procedural irregularity has nothing to do with trumps case
you are better off watching the daily club balls and holes dvd
you can get a glimpse of procedural irregularities in sidneys case heres an affidavit others can look over while you do you boo

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18 ... v-whitmer/

[Lachlan]

really if there is massive fraud that would be very sad because trust will be lost and really it would be a big embarrassment to you guys since massive fraud should have been detected. Frankly I would think that is worse than so and so winning the election.

[Most Lee Harmless]

procedural irregularity has nothing to do with trumps case
you are better off watching the daily club balls and holes dvd
you can get a glimpse of procedural irregularities in sidneys case heres an affidavit others can look over while you do you boo

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18 ... v-whitmer/

Yet the organisation tasked to investigate and protect cyber assets regarding the electoral process, with a head chosen by Trump himself, found nothing of the sort. Of course, the head got fired by Trump for mentioning that the allegations are baseless. Surprise surprise.

Are these the same level of allegations that claim Dominion is owned by Hilary? Satan? The secret deep-state Pedophile Pizza Company? How about the white-hat hackers who have been working on the same project and have found nothing? Affidavits are wonderful reading... until they get to court and the evidence ends up as hearsay, assumption, and plain unprovable, no matter what Q-Anon says.

Oh dear, Pennsylvania just tossed out another case on the grounds of baseless allegations. The judge that gave the ruling was nominated by Trump himself. Loyalty eh?