Last one to post wins

[Zephore]

But if others are suddenly unable to post, isn't it cheating?

[Meliva]

But if others are suddenly unable to post, isn't it cheating?

Blame Admin for not making any rules .

But in all seriousness, I do agree that even without any rules given, doing so would be cheating, and would honestly be pretty mean for me to do-which is why, despite occasionally teasing I could do it, I never do.


Still not gonna lie, its somewhat tempting

[Zephore]

Oh well

[Grimrock Litless]

Winner!

[DezNutz]

But if others are suddenly unable to post, isn't it cheating?

The only way there is a winner is if an admin/mod locks the forum. In the most likely situation, the admin/mod would post saying the game is over and lock the thread, making them the last post and winner.

[Zephore]

Then the admin and mod wars begin, when they lock/unlock constant

[DezNutz]

Then the admin and mod wars begin, when they lock/unlock constant

Only until the admin revokes all of the other mods access.

[Cgoody]

Cheating.

I don't see any rules against it in the first post, do you

Let's be real; based on a technicality you would win... But you and everyone else would all know that it really isn't a win.

[Lachlan]

this sin't exactly going to work because people are going to keep on posting

[Cgoody]

this sin't exactly going to work because people are going to keep on posting

That's kind of the idea. That's why people are saying no one will win until an admin comes along and locks it.