Maha wrote:we see enough 'strange suggestions being made on the forum by players that did not think their suggestion through enough or understand the context in which that suggestion is made. in a training guild i assume it will be doubly so.
Maha wrote:a dictator is a leader who forces people to follow him. who is or was bullied to stay in a guild? what kind of thread or force was used? maybe i am naive, but if you don't want to follow you just leave the guild. freedom of choice, take all or take none!
DoS wrote:Taking others opinions and no red tape can sometimes be opposites. That is when executive (leader) decisions must be made. This is my opinion of balance between the people in charge and the people not in charge.
Maha wrote: i truly do not understand what you say here.
DoS wrote:Well you clearly agree a dictatorship would fail, because people would leave. But in reality, giving people "fake powers" is just the same as dictatorship, just better played out. Instead of letting them use their powers, they are over watched on everything to point where they are basically asking for the leader to accept their plea. This is where red tape plays into hand, the unneeded and excessive instigating of others choices.
DoS wrote:When peoples opinion becomes too diverse to reach a conclusion, then it is the leader's choice to create an executive order.
Maha wrote:DoS wrote:Well you clearly agree a dictatorship would fail, because people would leave. But in reality, giving people "fake powers" is just the same as dictatorship, just better played out. Instead of letting them use their powers, they are over watched on everything to point where they are basically asking for the leader to accept their plea. This is where red tape plays into hand, the unneeded and excessive instigating of others choices.DoS wrote:When peoples opinion becomes too diverse to reach a conclusion, then it is the leader's choice to create an executive order.
so the leader has a multitude of sub leaders who come with diverse opinions. therefore the leader has to make an executive order which may seem to make the sub leaders powers "fake". and since this is "better played" it is a sneaky form of dictatorship? do you understand why i find this confusing?
leaving your parental home, or graduating from High School can be scary experiences. just as Wolfie wrote. Staying seems the safe way to do, but creates problems as well. some birds are kicked out of the nest to force them to fly. though love!
i am in favor of training guilds, but the 'graduation'from the guild will never be an easy one.
Twilight Consortium wrote:Just like any stories you heard, when leaderships up roots and moved on, it leaves behind a gapping hole. Unless you put Obama or Ben Franklin or Lee Kuan Yew in, the new leadership will not be able to gain grounds on their roles or on the members in such short span of time.
Shadowood wrote: I now also think guilds of large size (15+) hurt game play.
Maha wrote:Shadowood wrote: I now also think guilds of large size (15+) hurt game play.
has anyone ever tried to form a training nation?
it has some downsides, no way to monitor active voodoo and gc levels or even how active players are. but for those nations who want to grow (USSR, Canada, Vietnam) it could be a win win. new players get mentors to help them out while they also have a 'home' in a guild. and the training nations will get stronger in player base, fame and inner cohesive.