Egypt takes Seaglory!

[PhoenixKnight]

Mack, clearly it is not my issue who is ruling USA but when the current and prior kings both say the same thing, then I have no reason to doubt them. Do you disagree?

[Mack]

Not all of it

[Mack]

Yes i disagree.. two people do not make the nation.. who is in office at the time should be your concern for you know the present king has the support of only one man in the nation.. how can you deal with two people knowing the deal is sour to the rest of the nation then tell us i mean peace no offence ment by invading your land

[PhoenixKnight]

For the record, I only bought the ports after I was asked if I am interested in adding a new one. Egypt respected soveirenty of USA and the NAP. this was a trade agreement and not an aggression act. I cannot possibly negotiate with every USA player. I can only discuss with representatives. The current and prior representitives were in agreement about USA selling the ports. I have no reason to distrust them. If the citizens of USA are unsatisfied with their representitives, they can:
1. Change leadership
2. Change nation

What they cannot do is attack and condone me personally or my decision to engage in a trade agreement that will benefit my nation.

I have not broken any trust with USA. Any complaints should be directed to the leadership of USA.

[PhoenixKnight]

Yes i disagree.. two people do not make the nation.. who is in office at the time should be your concern for you know the present king has the support of only one man in the nation.. how can you deal with two people knowing the deal is sour to the rest of the nation then tell us i mean peace no offence ment by invading your land

Like I said I cannot reach to every one in the nation. The sale was public and hardly strong actions were taken by USA citizens to change leadership. If you want to negotiate something, them get your country in order and announce a new leader who can speak for you.

Seems to me LordAv or you Mack can be good choices.

[DezNutz]

Make a deal with our invading enemy and we are supposed to be ok with that as you payed for it right. I did think you were an ok guy i see the greed has set in

Sorry there Mack, but the US civil war is not Egypt or PhoenixKnight's problem. The US leadership, although contested internally, is still the apparent US Leadership. If you didn't want LT to sell the ports, you could have, as a Duke, taken steps to talk with the foreign nation leaders in an effort to prevent such actions from occurring.

[Shadowood]

Well said Phoenix

[Mack]

I dont have to explain it you know youre wrong that is all

[not a pirate]

I dont have to explain it you know youre wrong that is all

He's in the wrong for expanding his country under an accepted way by the governing person of the US?

[DezNutz]

Yes i disagree.. two people do not make the nation.. who is in office at the time should be your concern for you know the present king has the support of only one man in the nation.. how can you deal with two people knowing the deal is sour to the rest of the nation then tell us i mean peace no offence ment by invading your land

Like I said I cannot reach to every one in the nation. The sale was public and hardly strong actions were taken by USA citizens to change leadership. If you want to negotiate something, them get your country in order and announce a new leader who can speak for you.

Seems to me LordAv or you Mack can be good choices.

As a US Citizen, I agree (However, I'm undecided about who would be a good choice as leader after the LT/Danik fiasco.) It isn't your problem. The other US Dukes could have made a stand and done something about it. Complaining after the deal is done is too little too late.