Feniks wrote:Sir Edward Pellew wrote:
There is another way, its called a war between players, we have voodoo, ships, assets.. hit those, you want to win or come out on top, be the last ones standing. We are not acting for nations, we are acting as guild leaders and players tired of specific abusive play by a select few.
Honestly sir, and with respect, that is not how you are acting and judging by my inbox, that is not how a lot of Avonmora sees your actions.
It is coming across more like you are dictating exactly what is and is not allowed and claiming moral authority on those decisions simply because you are the "old-timers" as PK puts it.
Divorce yourself from the current issue and re-read Stan's original post. If you were outside looking in, how would you interpret that?
Doesn't sound at all like someone trying to be a leader, it sounds like a group trying to dictate to all others how they will be allowed to play.
Dmanwuzhere wrote:Sounds like hogwash to me I dont see a team of frenchmen just a bunch of would be tyrants
Stan Rogers wrote:Dmanwuzhere wrote:Sounds like hogwash to me I dont see a team of frenchmen just a bunch of would be tyrants
What you see is exactly what has happened. A group of players who are tired of seeing their responsibilities being constantly hit on have banded together to play in the same style as you choose to.
I personally was approached by 3 different members of TKP asking if I would care to become part of a coalition that will try to end the cowardly practice of picking on those less experienced and flush with coin.
It did not take a lot of convincing. I could see by looking through guild battles and port battles what they were talking about.
The solution is easy...just knock it off. The other option is to spout off, try to spin your actions into justifiable reasons to why you have chosen this style of game play.
Every one has choices so quit trying to say we are the problem. We are the solution to the problem that has manifested itself on your doorstep.
Stan Rogers wrote:Dez... its not that they are not "allowed" to hit. Hitting a new player is good for their development. Hitting a new player numerous times is, essentially frowned upon by most here in Avonmora.
Would you not agree ?
DezNutz wrote:Stan Rogers wrote:Dez... its not that they are not "allowed" to hit. Hitting a new player is good for their development. Hitting a new player numerous times is, essentially frowned upon by most here in Avonmora.
Would you not agree ?
Yes, but I'm also a realist in the extent that I could cast on a player tomorrow not knowing that someone cast on him yesterday. But because it occurred back to back, it's excessive.
Sir Edward Pellew wrote:DezNutz wrote:Stan Rogers wrote:Dez... its not that they are not "allowed" to hit. Hitting a new player is good for their development. Hitting a new player numerous times is, essentially frowned upon by most here in Avonmora.
Would you not agree ?
Yes, but I'm also a realist in the extent that I could cast on a player tomorrow not knowing that someone cast on him yesterday. But because it occurred back to back, it's excessive.
Not at all, but if you cast on 3 players of one guild today, then "you" again cast on the same players the next day, then the next.... that is most definitely excessive.