Danik wrote:One of the greatest sea battles, with enormous losses for the defeated, was the attempt to break the British blockade which ended up at Trafalgar. The last major sea battle was also an attempt to break a blockade, that was Jutland, with horrendous loss in life and ships. So, lets have a dose of reality here..
I like this. We can't jump right away at this though.
However, we are open to more ideas that will increase the stakes for both.
Benjamin Hornigold wrote:If a nation does not defend the port, the merchants using it as say a party port and one they have invested a lot into to increase their warehouse size may perhaps seek to see it controlled by a different nation. One that will protect it and they can continue their trade. Back door politics and funding new ownership will become even more necessary.
If you want more reason to defend, and claim the profits are small as it is, perhaps a larger tax on goods is to be added, one which is lost entirely when trade is blockaded.
Agreed at first part.
Larger tax on goods is a possibility. There is plenty of room for extra tax.
Current Tax wrote:-Every resource sold from the port market, returns 1% of the value to the nation that controls it.
With Blockades this can be raised. Every 1% should (roughly - quick estimate) be about 300k daily profit per port with current traffic. With more fleets though and same players, this can rise further. We can adjust this if need be.