UK official declaration of War

[DezNutz]

I'm sure many are slightly confused about this war between the UK and the USA over a port owned by Kiribati in which most of the fighting seems to be taking place between people who are not in the UK, the USA or Kiribati. Whilst not wishing to in any way prevent mindless mayhem and, of course, not demanding that those fighting need provide any justification beyond the need to break things with a satisfying crash... but what is it about then?

Everyone seems to be getting tripped up by the Baramas situation. Obviously that tied into other intel. This basically boils down to we are tired of taking it laying down and we needed to make sure a statement was made that we will retaliate and execute against any attacker.

Sounds like you just chose the easiest target you could find and said there let's make an example because we can, as you have provided no evidence what so ever that anyone in the USA was casting conspiracies and DBs on the UK. The Baramas BS ties into nothing. Please post your other intel. I keep hearing about this intel, but no one has said what it is. I have yet to see anything other than Baramas Topic and Influence Purchases on a port that occurred after the UK gave up ownership to that port. In a court of law, the judge would laugh you right out of the court room with what you have and probably hit you with filing a frivolous lawsuit.

How much will the USA pay if I say I did it and took the blame for them, I will happily take the blame
For a price.

Nothing. Why would we pay you to confess to something that there is no evidence of.

[sXs]

I Feniks, took this action on my own. Although we did discus it in council forum. It was my action alone. After all, you can't hold an entire nation responsible for the actions of it's citizens

After all, the UK council did not vote on this.

[DezNutz]

I Feniks, took this action on my own. Although we did discus it in council forum. It was my action alone. After all, you can't hold an entire nation responsible for the actions of it's citizens

After all, the UK council did not vote on this.

Yeah except the first post of this topic. Thanks for playing, let's make dumb posts trying to be smart but in reality look only dumber.

[Meliva]

Please post your other intel. I keep hearing about this intel, but no one has said what it is. I have yet to see anything other than Baramas Topic and Influence Purchases on a port that occurred after the UK gave up ownership to that port.

They might not be able to due to the rules about not posting information without the other party's consent. Though I admit that the evidence they have posted isn't really enough to prove the US is the culprit.

[Xxmontyxx]

I as the new governor of a port I never sought, wanted nor voted upon acquiring do hereby declare my innocence to all charges that may be laid against me

[DezNutz]

I as the new governor of a port I never sought, wanted nor voted upon acquiring do hereby declare my innocence to all charges that may be laid against me

Sorry, Monty, but the UK declared war. All members are free game from my understanding of war declaration.

[Xxmontyxx]

I as the new governor of a port I never sought, wanted nor voted upon acquiring do hereby declare my innocence to all charges that may be laid against me

Sorry, Monty, but the UK declared war. All members are free game from my understanding of war declaration.

I understand ... All I ask is please go easy on my poor citizens- I am called Monty the Magnimonius by my people for good reason

[sXs]

I Feniks, took this action on my own. Although we did discus it in council forum. It was my action alone. After all, you can't hold an entire nation responsible for the actions of it's citizens

After all, the UK council did not vote on this.

Yeah except the first post of this topic. Thanks for playing, let's make dumb posts trying to be smart but in reality look only dumber.

No I am just pointing out the idiocy of the argument you have used several times now. Any port card cast is a nation action. Prop Cons and BDs all nation action cards no matter who cast them. This subjects the Nation of the caster of the cards as a target and part in parcel, partly responsible for the action.

[Stan Rogers]

Please post your other intel. I keep hearing about this intel, but no one has said what it is. I have yet to see anything other than Baramas Topic and Influence Purchases on a port that occurred after the UK gave up ownership to that port.

They might not be able to due to the rules about not posting information without the other party's consent. Though I admit that the evidence they have posted isn't really enough to prove the US is the culprit.

It is so much easier to find those who who did not commit the act that to find evidence that one is guilty of charged offence.
You eliminate the No's and who you have left, some or one is guilty. Courts of Avonmora rules. Regular civil court rules don't apply here despite Dez's attempt to apply them.

[Meliva]

No I am just pointing out the idiocy of the argument you have used several times now. Any port card cast is a nation action. Prop Cons and BDs all nation action cards no matter who cast them. This subjects the Nation of the caster of the cards as a target and part in parcel, partly responsible for the action.

I have to disagree with that. By that logic if I decided to lets say switch nations to Spain, and hit the UK that thereby means Spain is partly responsible for my action? Going by that logic will most surely lead to MANY wars. Nothing to stop someone from switching to a nation and casting just to cause a war between them and the UK.