US Next War

[ChaIbaud]

League of Nations: Article X could totally help out right now, @ the US Senate of almost a century ago. Honestly, I believe that a regime change should be possible if those who are backing it are in it with regal reasons and not any personal goals in mind. The US revolution has been the only lastingly successful revolution... many say diversity is greatness, but unfortunately they limit this to a quota of races instead of the inclusion of intellectual diversifications. Do something like we did before entering The Great War and tell the extremists to stop these unnecessary actions such as broadcasting executions and murdering innocents and if they don't, make sure the carpet matches the rug.

[Donald Trump]

Really? Are you saying the fighting between sects will end if Assad is removed?

Yes Assad needs to be brought up on charges of at minimum human rights violations up to war crimes. But How will it guarantee peace in the nation?

After all, shouldn't the ultimate goal be a day when all can walk down the street without worrying about their children being attacked because of the beliefs of their parents? That will never happen unless there is a shift in thinking no matter who is governing.

Are you asking me that? Because I think the exact opposite.

[Donald Trump]

Regardless of this philosophical issue.


Is Trump becoming a globalist? He is intervening with other countries. Something many of his isolationist supporting voters disliked about the Obama administration.

If this trend continues. Will he still be backed?

Especially by Alex Jones imo crazy supporters? I mean. How do people back this guy?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2okLFw9TIEI

Go to 2:49

[Most Lee Harmless]

Okay so, Trump supporters were condemning US intervention in other states : Obama did not intervene in Syria : Now Trump has intervened in Syria, Obama is condemned for not intervening in Syria : sheesh, couldnt make it up.

[Bmw]

one thing that is good coming out of us sending those missiles into Syria is that it shows that the US under the trump administration will hold up international law.

[Most Lee Harmless]

one thing that is good coming out of us sending those missiles into Syria is that it shows that the US under the trump administration will hold up international law.

Really? An act of aggression against a sovereign nation is upholding international law? I think you have little idea of what international law means in such cases : an analogy is to perhaps compare the investigation, prosecution and judgement of a criminal act through the legal system, and the acts of a vigilante lynch mob.

There has been no investigation, no gathering of physical evidence, no testing of evidence of witnesses or participants, no reference to laws appertaining to the alleged act, no prosecution case, no defence case presented by advocates and laid before a judge and jury.

Nope, we have had a media outrage, a knee-jerk response by the Administration founded on bugger all evidence and mainly carried out to look good back home.

Now, that may be good politics, it may even have a moral value : but dont call it 'international law'.

[Maha]

Okay so, Trump supporters were condemning US intervention in other states : Obama did not intervene in Syria : Now Trump has intervened in Syria, Obama is condemned for not intervening in Syria : sheesh, couldnt make it up.

[Grimrock Litless]

Don't go and randomly say US is gonna start a war just because they have the most military might.and has a "clown" running it.

Oh, I see where you are getting at.

Oh also, trump is not stupid at all, he is a smart man, able to make people vote for him like how hitler did. Oh wait.

Remember that time hillary also said she wanted to start a war? And everyone of the big guys supported trump because trump didn't say he wanted war? Good times.

Remember that time where they said the voting system was rigged? Oh wait, it still is.

Ignore the crossed out words.

[PhoenixKnight]

Don't get me wrong, I like the US but I think it is wrong how they get away with what essentially is acts of war, invasion and terrorist attacks with an Oops or we are attacking terrorists or what's not!

[DezNutz]

Hypocrisy in action. No matter what was done, there would be outrage toward the US.

US acts as a result of a chemical weapon attack where the country stated they relinquished all chemical agents over. Outrage over US attacking.

US doesn't act as a result of a chemical weapon attack where the country stated they relinquished all chemical agents over. Outrage over US doing nothing.