Legendary [Wrath of God]

[PhoenixKnight]

Level: Legendary
Cost to cast: 100 turns
Cost to make:
50 FOJ + 40 Thieving Magpie +20 Vengeance of the witch doctor +30 Hands of Gold+30 Hostile Natives + 30 Hostile Waters+ 40 Chains of justice + 20 Call Leviathan +10 call the kraken +5 swarm of worms.
Chances of success to make: 50%
Chance of cast Success: 50%
Description: Extremely rare and dangerous curse.
Effect on target:All target ships lose 2 levels, if ship level is less than 2, it goes to the bottom of the sea. Target loses 1 out of every 10 cards in their voodoo chest.
Backlash: Caster takes 10% equivalent damage or gets all attack voodoo lost by target active on him or her.

[Grimrock Litless]

This would very well, certainly fit the description of being "Legendary", I am fine with it, but I am not sure about others.

The chance based thing, makes it not so worth it to use so much voodoo, with 20% to success make and 10% cast success, in the end, the over all chance is only 2%. Which is a terrible low chance.

[Shadowood]

you only have a 20% chance to make this... and then only a 10% chance it will land on target...

I do understand this card suggestion is the biggest suggestion to date. If you were to cast this on someone like CDV, CD, Mohammed you would do some huge damage. But who is going to take the risk losing all this voodoo, NOT ONCE, but TWICE.

Having said that, nice suggestion. My only issue is with the chance to make and chance to cast. Maybe 50%, 50%... Effectively giving you a 25% chance it will all work out.

[PhoenixKnight]

OK. 50% for each. (edited)
FYI, this card is meant as like a last resort of a very angry but weak person against a strong powerful player.
That is why I thought its chances should be low.

[Most Lee Harmless]

I dont see how a weak but angry player would have either the hideout and witch hut sufficient to make it, nor the large amount of expensive voodoo in the recipe : I would rather think such a weak, but angry, player would be better off casting that voodoo than risking it all on consecutive coin-tosses. But anger makes us do stupid things at times so, its possible a weak, but angry, player might have some use for such a concept.
PS : shouldnt it be anonymous too, so the weak, but angry, caster doesnt get any payback from the strong, but now angrier, target?

[Admiral Nelson]

OK. 50% for each. (edited)
FYI, this card is meant as like a last resort of a very angry but weak person against a strong powerful player.
That is why I thought its chances should be low.

And a weak person would have 50 FoJ, 40 Thieving magpies and other such resources lying about?...

[Most Lee Harmless]

OK. 50% for each. (edited)
FYI, this card is meant as like a last resort of a very angry but weak person against a strong powerful player.
That is why I thought its chances should be low.

And a weak person would have 50 FoJ, 40 Thieving magpies and other such resources lying about?...

Obviously a rich, weak, but angry, person...

[Admiral Nelson]

Obviously a rich, weak, but angry, person...

Weak at the knees?

He must of seen your forum posts, Danik.

[PhoenixKnight]

Just a very angry person then.

[Admiral Nelson]

:D
Just a very angry person then.

Why risk using this card... When you can hire...

* Insert Haron's Comment here *