Dropping fleet danger

Anything related to in-game diplomacy (and beyond) can be brought here.
Guild news and announcements, war declarations, recruitment, military service offerings, etc.

Flaming is expected here. If you are easily offended, avoid this thread all together.

Is this danger manipulation?

Yes
15
71%
No
6
29%
 
Total votes : 21

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Grimrock Litless » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:49 pm

mister chalbooti wrote:Guluere isn't exactly known for being very smart and analytical


What does smart mean? Heard it is the opposite of st*p1d, but never really knew what it means.
"Got ya."
User avatar
Grimrock Litless
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:50 pm
Location: Under the sea, in a submarine!

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Admiral Nelson » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:50 pm

Samuel Lowe wrote:Anyways this was a year ago I have no intentions of doing this again unless CJ says it's ok. But I/we were just making use of the resources available.

Would be said to die knowing you didn't do all you could.


A year ago? Oh no, this was 2 months ago, Sir Lowe!

In fact , I remember the battles clearly in Aiora, ATC will back me up' after such action was done I cast Spy Network/Eng-lightened vision to find out if it be pure cheating, and so it be... Such a Law abiding citizen I be'.

I do really not get the final quote, sorry.
User avatar
Admiral Nelson
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:48 am

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:53 pm

That my friend was not me.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Admiral Nelson » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:55 pm

Post explaining why someone would do this , and my opinion on it has been updated.

Stating Jack Aubrey/Henry Avery was the first to use this, Roberts only copied such a action.

I, myself voted no on such actions mateys' - But, think its 50/50 depending on what the player does. ;)
Last edited by Admiral Nelson on Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Admiral Nelson
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:48 am

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:55 pm

Anyways anyone is up for a raid on Roberts?
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby Grimrock Litless » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:56 pm

The vote, 5 : 1, not sure if CJ saw it.
"Got ya."
User avatar
Grimrock Litless
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:50 pm
Location: Under the sea, in a submarine!

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:57 pm

Nervous Nelson wrote:Post explaining why someone would do this , and my opinion on it has been updated.

Stating Jack Aubrey/Henry Avery was the first to use this, Roberts only copied such a action.


Seems all the persons who use this tactic took an early retirement.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:58 pm

5:2
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby ChaIbaud » Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:59 pm

Samuel Lowe wrote:
Nervous Nelson wrote:Post explaining why someone would do this , and my opinion on it has been updated.

Stating Jack Aubrey/Henry Avery was the first to use this, Roberts only copied such a action.


Seems all the persons who use this tactic took an early retirement.

Not every cheater makes new accounts ;)
PM me any complaints (10M gold coin wire fee is mandatory).
User avatar
ChaIbaud
 
Posts: 1752
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:24 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Danger Manipulation- Getting Banned

Postby William Pitt » Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:00 pm

Says?
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

PreviousNext

Return to Union of Honor