Page 1 of 1

xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:39 am
by Kangaroo
This "player" has no ships, yet Admirals: 84 Captains: 413 Merchants: 81
Has only been registered a very very short time yet has almost 9000!! voodoo cards.

I've approached the game moderators for an explanation, but it would be most refreshing if the real account holder behind this one had the balls to put it out there and confess to not only running duplicate accounts but tell us how and why.

Popcorn sales would go through the roof.

It is a seriously flawed aspect of the game that it allows the fleet arm and the voodoo arm of an account play separately, or am I alone in thinking this?

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:32 pm
by Captain Jack
There is only one thing that fits in the forums in this post and even this one is not worded out well. I am referring to the habit of some to play the witch doctors without any ships (as a result, without any risk). Should this practice continues, the game rules will change faster than anticipated. As they will change for sure as this is a long term issue. I will create a new topic about it,please do not discuss this here.

For the rest of the post, let's set some things straight:

-You may NOT post gameplay data of anyone in the public forums.

-Whenever you suspect someone of having multiple accounts, bringing the issue into the public forums is prohibited.

-It is prohibited for the following reasons:

A)In every multiplay case, there are 3 parties involved:
-The account holder(s) who know the truth.
-Administration who has a wealth of information and can guess the truth.
-The rest, who have access to limited information.

As a result, for this reason, the best thing to do when you suspect someone of multiplay is to report it to administration alongside with your info.

B)Whenever you accuse someone of multiplay, or any other rule violation, you harm his fame.

Socrates used the triple filter before hearing anyone. Here is the story to understand this triple filter:

Triple Filter wrote:In ancient Greece, Socrates (the famous philosopher) was visited by an acquaintance of his. Eager to share some juicy gossip, the man asked if Socrates would like to know the story he’d just heard about a friend of theirs.

Socrates replied that before the man spoke, he needed to pass the “Triple-Filter” test.

The first filter, he explained, is Truth.
“Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to say is true?”

The man shook his head.“No, I actually just heard about it, and …
Socrates cut him off.

“You don’t know for certain that it is true, then. Is what you want to say something good or kind?”
Again, the man shook his head.“No! Actually, just the opposite. You see …”

Socrates lifted his hand to stop the man speaking.

“So you are not certain that what you want to say is true, and it isn’t good or kind. One filter still remains, though, so you may yet still tell me. That is Usefulness or Necessity. Is this information useful or necessary to me?”
A little defeated, the man replied,“No, not really.”

“Well, then,”Socrates said, turning on his heel.“If what you want to say is neither true, nor good or kind, nor useful or necessary, please don’t say anything at all.”


The only source that needs to hear such accusations, is administration as only administration can utilize the information.


C)Administration Baiting

By bringing such an issue to the public, especially when everyone else brings it to administration and especially after you already messaged administration about it, is an open challenge towards administration.

Players must have an element of trust towards administration. Without it, your first reaction to the every problem will be to blame administration. This practice is very common to most browser games]/b]. We strive to ensure fair gameplay and we put the game above [b]everyone. No matter how much anyone might pay to buy credits, non can buy the game or us.

Kangaroo, if you still cannot understand where we are coming from, just think what your reaction would be if the one posting was xProx and the one accusing was you. Would you like anyone stepping and accusing you of multiplay?

No warnings will be given as I am convinced you are simply unaware of the forum rules. You should check them though.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3

-Back to everyone, I cannot remove a forum topic where such an accusation has remained. I want to give the chance to the one that has been accused, to come up with his reply and then close the topic.

Please do not step into this topic further. After xProx has posted, it will be locked.

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:57 pm
by xPROx
Kangawho? Socrates should look at you. I am busy but I am me. I make some howkers to try steal if you want. You want my 60 mow? I am at work no time for you. Want cards and captains but to slow getting them then by them it ant my problem.

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:02 pm
by Poppy
I side with xpro. he can take some time from the game without the conspiracies (theories, not cards) tied to his name. although I did enjoy the bounty attached to those conspiracies

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:21 pm
by sXs
With all the ghost/alt accounts in this game, you have accused xPROx.

LOL that is classic.

If I was going to be away or busy and unable to watch my account, I would do exactly what xPROx has done.

I will have the popcorn and rum ready to watch the show when PRO returns full force.

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:31 pm
by Lana
Busy??? With casting on two peoples who even didn't know him (although he was member of our guild)? Sorry xPROx, being busy in RL to notice you...

Btw, xPROx, mokey d luffy is not Monkey D. Luffy... just fyi.

Re: xPROx Man or Mouse?

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:42 pm
by Captain Jack
Feniks wrote:With all the ghost/alt accounts in this game, you have accused xPROx.


@everyone
That's exactly what I mean. That's a good example of what I was describing earlier.

@Feniks
Please take some time to read what I wrote above. You are less than a year here and you speak like as if you know the truth that we don't; I have not seen a single message from you where you shared any of such concerns. If you got any ghost/alt accounts in your mind, please share these information with administration instead of this unacceptable statement.

@everyone
This topic is now locked. If you suspect anyone of cheating, bring this matter to administration. The public forums are not the right place, for the fore mentioned reasons.