DezNutz wrote:Feniks wrote:LOL first it was "we discussed it in council chat, but didn't vote on it"
Then it was "I only see 4.9 mill influence, that doesn't mean anything"
Now it is pointed out that it was around 10 million and you come back with more meaningless babble.
I made a promise to Kiribati that for 90 days I would help them maintain their port, much like the agreements St Kitts drafted with every nation it gifted ports. Hector said thank you but didn't ask for any help.
And as far as every nation getting hit....... tell me again how much the USA lost? How much did Tokelau lose and St Kittts?
98% of its' population.
Conspiracy theories I got one. USA hits every nation including their own but the real focus was on UK in order to weaken them and possibly steal one of their ports. All conjecture, and probablt not true because heh what the hell..... the council didn't vote on it.
And USA is one to talk about skating on low influence.
What I stated are facts. The US Council does not control what a player does with their own money on their own. It was discussed and no vote occurred. If DoS and RJ decided to put influence in that port, that is there choice. They can put influence in any port they want. That isn't a crime or necessarily an offence against another nation. It is certainly not an offense against a nation that isn't the port owner and expressly wrote that there is no connection between the UK and Kiribati. So the amount of influence is meaningless.
Stop getting tripped up with Baramas. I give approx 0 fcks about Baramas. The fact of the matter is our ports were assaulted. The US had made attacks against our ports in the past whether "council approved" or not. It is clear that action was being taken to affect our ports directly and we have every reason to believe that the US is the culprit. Now you can either start talking about how you are going to reach an agreement with us to end the war or you can go back into your troll hole.