Dmanwuzhere wrote:Leo wrote:Hold on. Don't mix up the way things always have been with the way things should be. The government could pay for every single person to have the bare minimum in order to survive, and it would cost the taxpayers almost nothing compared to our other expenses. People wouldn't "live off of the system" because no one wants the bare minimum. People want money to spend on the things they like, to go out out to eat, to watch movies, to go to concerts etc. no one wants to just survive, people want to LIVE. And this is proven by countries which have implemented such programs, refered to as basic universal income, which still have great economies and no one really lives off the taxpayer dollars because it's simply not enough to have an enjoyable life. That's about as socialist as I get. I don't believe that luxuries should be socialized, because that takes away incentive for people to work. I also don't believe that business owners shouldn't make more than their employees, because that takes away incentive to run a business. I think capitalism can work, but these socialist programs are needed to keep it from being exploited, and then even if it does they are there to safeguard the poor. Let dying of poverty be a thing of the past, told about in stories but not a current reality.
WTF![]()
![]()
![]()
FOOK YOU![]()
![]()
![]()
The Idea that a nonworking or less paid individual, which means the individual is putting less in the system, should receive govt cash is in no way indicative of a healthy
society.
If you want to really live, then you need to really work by inventing, providing, or creating a service society will really pay you for,
This may mean educating yourself or training to enhance your desirability, thus your pay.
But the idea that you receive pay just because you exist is a level of laziness that should never be reached.
Addressing poverty in the US is as simple as working on the educational system, being tough on crime, teaching basic nutrition, and promoting the nuclear family and not having kids before your education is complete and you are married.
My eldest daughter is 28 today, She lived at home for 5 years while going to college and working to become the RN she is today.
During those 5 years, she lived rent-free so she could save for a down payment on a house and pay off her student loan.
Then she went and put her down payment on the house she wanted and is now paying on her own home and has paid off her student debt.
Now she wastes money on levels I never could or would. But she can do that as she is being a responsible adult.
I may not agree on all her spending, although her savings look good too but she is accountable as an adult to herself and is a healthy contributing citizen.
That should be the goal.
As parents, it is your role to be the government in your scenario.
5 years of no bills for 5 years of hard work equals freedom for your child from poverty.
Simple.
Your hands-out approach teaches laziness and encourages people to be less than what they can be.
Which probably leads to suicide.
Without the knowledge and skills required for well-compensated work in the modern workplace, each succeeding generation of undereducated adults merely replaces the one before it without achieving any upward mobility or escape from poverty.
Ahh, I see you're promoting the myth that the harder you work, the more rich you'll become. The hardest working people are the poor. The people that have to work overtime every week to support their families, the single mothers, the factory workers, the miners, the school teachers etc. I don't believe in a welfare system that promotes laziness. I believe in a welfare system that helps people in need. I also think it wouldn't be a bad idea for people to only be eligible for these programs if they are already working or if there is evidence they have been attempting to get a job, similar to how unemployment pay works. People "exploiting the system" just refers to trading their welfare money for things like drugs. People do that anyway, regardless of if it's welfare money. If people want to throw away their opportunity to have a stable life who am I to stop them?