Lachlan wrote:Lil Lola wrote:Lachlan..the authors of your article..this is not even their respective fields to be writing an article like this.
Francesco Chirico 1,✉, Jaime A Teixeira da Silva 2, Panagiotis Tsigaris 3, Khan Sharun 4
Author information
1 Department of Public Health, Post-graduate School of Occupational Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
2 Independent Researcher, Kagawa-Ken, Japan
3 Department of Economics, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
4 Division of Surgery, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
✉ For correspondence: Prof Francesco Chirico, Via Umberto Cagni, 21 20162 Milano, Italy
number 4 and 3 yes probably, number 1 I would say is qualified and number 2 taking a quick look at what other papers he has helped with it is actually his area of expertise.
However what I sent is a literature review where the essentially look at other people's findings and summarize each study's reviews. The two less qualified individuals are listed last and second last meaning they contributed less to the study than the first 2.
Well occupational medicine is actually for work related injuries. Occupational Therapy has to do with your gross motor skills.
Independent researcher…too general..