Mercanti wrote:Interesting post
Welcome to the forums mate!
Mercanti wrote:Interesting post
Astragek wrote:Suggested 6 years ago. No loan shark yet
DezNutz wrote:Astragek wrote:Suggested 6 years ago. No loan shark yet
Unless mathematics changed recently, this suggestion was made in Feb 2016. It is currently Oct 2017. So it's 1 year and 8 months. Don't know how you got 6 years.
Astragek wrote:DezNutz wrote:Astragek wrote:Suggested 6 years ago. No loan shark yet
Unless mathematics changed recently, this suggestion was made in Feb 2016. It is currently Oct 2017. So it's 1 year and 8 months. Don't know how you got 6 years.
Sorry my phone showed februari 2011Or maybe I had a few too many too drink last night. Quite possible.
Kangaroo wrote:There is a fundamental flaw with this as broached, a player being potentially required to display all liquidable assets to a banker whom is otherwise also a competitor/rival is such a heinous call that were it to be implemented I would no longer borrow.
I have no issue with the proposed Rank 10 and 20 "rewards" but the level 1 would end my not inconsiderable business as a borrower.
Kangaroo wrote:There is a fundamental flaw with this as broached, a player being potentially required to display all liquidable assets to a banker whom is otherwise also a competitor/rival is such a heinous call that were it to be implemented I would no longer borrow.
I have no issue with the proposed Rank 10 and 20 "rewards" but the level 1 would end my not inconsiderable business as a borrower.
DezNutz wrote:Kangaroo wrote:There is a fundamental flaw with this as broached, a player being potentially required to display all liquidable assets to a banker whom is otherwise also a competitor/rival is such a heinous call that were it to be implemented I would no longer borrow.
I have no issue with the proposed Rank 10 and 20 "rewards" but the level 1 would end my not inconsiderable business as a borrower.
The player could just refuse to consent and try a different banker.
You have no problem with Rank 10 and 20? So tell me how a banker should be able to mark items as collateral which requires the "Investigate" and than later Confiscate those items if he can't see them via a consented report.
I guess you think Bankers should take all the risk and just hand out their hard earned money with no checks available to them.
Homer wrote:Well i dont think i would use a bank that i dont get along with.. so your out on a huge debt huh