by Most Lee Harmless » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:06 pm
The argument for a Witch Hut has not be won : its all been too vague : it might be this, it might be that, it might do those, it might do them, it may be here, it may be there : meanwhile, those who have not been convinced by these non-specific arguments (for what exactly IS being proposed, in its totality?) keep being asked to somehow justify not wanting it, as if change must, per se, be good and progressive and opposition is regressive and evidence of some character flaw.
The proponents of the Witch Hut, and associated voodoo, have not produced a coherent set of proposals, so what the heck are we being asked to vote on? What we hope it might be, maybe ?
-1 : Move to archive.