Letter of Marque

All disapproved suggestions or suggestions that refer to disapproved suggestion can be found here.

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby William Pitt » Sat Jun 11, 2016 11:46 pm

John jacob astor wrote:
Chaulbad wrote:+1

John probably doesn't want this because he has wronged some dangerous people



lol. that is funny. do you really think that not having one of these letters would stop Juicy from attacking me if he wanted to? he can attack me whenever he wants, that is part of the game. but it has no influence on my opinion about this "feature." it is simply just useless


Well,look at it this way. Your guild doesn't allow you to attack anyone more than 3 times but you are attacked more than 3 times. If the letter allows you to attack back*(if the person is targeted) you CAN attack Juicy as much as you like for a period of time. Don't put yourself in the defender path look at the offensive and tell me if anything changes,eh?
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby William Pitt » Sat Jun 11, 2016 11:48 pm

Quote of the day

The sea does not reward those who are too anxious, too greedy, or too impatient. One should lie empty, open, choiceless as a beach - waiting for a gift from the sea.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby Meliva » Sat Jun 11, 2016 11:51 pm

Sir Richard Delrio wrote:
John jacob astor wrote:
Chaulbad wrote:+1

John probably doesn't want this because he has wronged some dangerous people



lol. that is funny. do you really think that not having one of these letters would stop Juicy from attacking me if he wanted to? he can attack me whenever he wants, that is part of the game. but it has no influence on my opinion about this "feature." it is simply just useless


Well,look at it this way. Your guild doesn't allow you to attack anyone more than 3 times but you are attacked more than 3 times. If the letter allows you to attack back*(if the person is targeted) you CAN attack Juicy as much as you like for a period of time. Don't put yourself in the defender path look at the offensive and tell me if anything changes,eh?


if your guild doesn't allow members to attack more then 3 times, I don't think having a letter is going to make them exempt you from that rule, in fact theres nothing stopping Sir John to launch an all out attack on Juicy right now, except for retaliation, and I doubt Juicy will let it slide just because he has a letter. your acting like having this letter is going to make people just let you do whatever you want while you have it, when in reality no one would care if you have a letter or not.
I'm a meanie head! Beware my Meanness :arr
User avatar
Meliva
Community Administrator
 
Posts: 6610
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby William Pitt » Sat Jun 11, 2016 11:52 pm

We'll see.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby Meliva » Sat Jun 11, 2016 11:55 pm

if you really wanna see what people think about this, why not open a poll that asks the question, if this was introduced would you let someone with a letter attack as much as they want and not have any issue with it. I'm pretty sure the poll will be one sided against this idea.
I'm a meanie head! Beware my Meanness :arr
User avatar
Meliva
Community Administrator
 
Posts: 6610
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby William Pitt » Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:00 am

I/we have not stated anywhere in the suggestion that the person on the receiving end would be okay with it. In real life those nations who hired pirates and those who they were hired against were not okay with it. In fact it was normal for a nation to hire a pirate against another nation and when the job was done they'd kill him.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby Meliva » Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:07 am

my apologies I misinterpreted a part of your idea. allow my to rephrase then. you mention that if your guild has a rule of 3 and doesn't allow members to attack more then 3 times, this letter would allow an individual to break this rule, so lets ask guild leaders if they would be okay with one of their members to break this rule simply due to a letter.
I'm a meanie head! Beware my Meanness :arr
User avatar
Meliva
Community Administrator
 
Posts: 6610
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 12:53 am

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby Sebena » Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:16 am

Sir Richard Delrio wrote:
John jacob astor wrote:
Chaulbad wrote:+1

John probably doesn't want this because he has wronged some dangerous people



lol. that is funny. do you really think that not having one of these letters would stop Juicy from attacking me if he wanted to? he can attack me whenever he wants, that is part of the game. but it has no influence on my opinion about this "feature." it is simply just useless


Well,look at it this way. Your guild doesn't allow you to attack anyone more than 3 times but you are attacked more than 3 times. If the letter allows you to attack back*(if the person is targeted) you CAN attack Juicy as much as you like for a period of time. Don't put yourself in the defender path look at the offensive and tell me if anything changes,eh?



The catch is here this letter wouldn't mean a thing to the guild you clearly doesn't understand Guild-Nation is not same.

Yes there are nations like Bermuda whose members are part of the same guild in this case SSTG but catch is that we separate our guilds buissness and our nation buissness. So you could have 10 of these letters but still that wouldn't change our guild rule and you would be punished for breaking our rules. I hope that this helps you understand that there is no feature that will be allowed so that you can disobey guild. Guilds are player made and if game interefere with it it will be doomed because player wouldn't feel free.
Last edited by Sebena on Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”
User avatar
Sebena
 
Posts: 1697
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 3:20 pm

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby DezNutz » Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:19 am

-1
I'm only here for Game Development and Forum Moderation.

If you see a forum rule violation, report the post.
User avatar
DezNutz
Players Dev Team Coordinator
 
Posts: 7081
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:51 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Letter of Marque

Postby William Pitt » Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:31 am

I'll incorporate this with the NWO.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
User avatar
William Pitt
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:36 pm
Location: TAO HQ

PreviousNext

Return to Disapproved