Haron wrote:Danik, that is also wrong. 1-2-1 is identical to 1-1-2, which is actually identical to 1-2. thus, 1-2-1 is not a 3 port trading route at all, but a 2 port trading route. 1-2-1-3, however, is a "true" 4 port trading route. It will give a different result than a 1-2 trading route, and also a different result than any other trading route (except 2-1-3-1 and 3-1-2-1, which are its duplicates).
Its a logic trap : read the conditions given by Captain Dungeness : if 1-2-1-2 is disqualified due to 1-2 being 'unique', then 1-3 is also unique and disqualifies any combination of ports containing 1-3 or its reverse : between them, they will disqualify any combination of ports containing 1, 2, or 3 : This will then apply to all combinations of 3 or 4 ports once you have established the first set of unique pairs between 21 ports : 1 > 2 up to 21 ; 2 > 3 up to 21 ; and so on.
The essential condition seems to be that you may not travel the same route between 2 ports twice, nor in reverse : ergo, once you have used that route, you cannot use it again in any other combination.