Kim - there is a great deal out there to support both sides of the argument>If you only read one point of view you will not educate yourself to other possibilities. EG: If you only read info that supports something then your view is biased. It is wise to read both for and against before making up your own mind. Read everything. Not just what suits your opinion or the way you want it to be.
Climate change is an overview of the general ambience and could be called a big wheel. We seem to all agree on this.
Weather is what you experience every day - if the sun is up or if it is raining and windy etc.
And weather would be described as the wheel within the bigger wheel.
Climate change has always been and always will be. The changes are more extreme but slower over greater period of time. And happen on a number of planets.( Don't include planets with internal warming systems.)
Weather changes nearly every moment.
https://www.universetoday.com/36296/climate-of-venus/ This is the overall climate of Venus.
"In many ways Venus is Earth’s twin planet. It’s only a little smaller, and made up of the same composition as Earth. But when it comes to climate, Venus couldn’t really be more different. Venus is a hellish world – the hottest planet in the Solar System, with an average temperature of more than 400°C, and a surface pressure almost 100 times what we experience here on Earth. On top of that, there are clouds of sulfuric acid and other corrosive chemicals. Visiting Venus would be the worst vacation ever."
https://www.universetoday.com/36296/climate-of-venus/https://www.financialexpress.com/archiv ... go/572665/"Its clear that the world was warmer during medieval times. By mapping the data published (all peer-reviewed) by 752 individual scientists from 442 separate research institutions across 41 different countries, and correlating their comparisons of temperatures changes since medieval times, after factoring in the fact that these studies use a range of ice cores, stalagmites, sediments and isotopes, we find that temperatures were about 0.5C warmer worldwide.
Prior to IPCCs third assessment report of 2001, the accepted depiction of the prior millenniums warmth was that published in the panels 1990 maiden assessment global temperatures had fluctuated drastically over the period. And data derived from sources including tree-rings, lake sediments, ice cores and historical documents bear out that position. Indeed, its abundantly evident that since the last glacial period ended, over 14,000 years ago, the Earths climate has undergone multi-century swings from warming to cooling that occur often and with remarkable rapidity. And not one but three such radical shifts occurred within the past millennium.
The years 900-1300 AD have been labelled the Medieval Warming Period, as global temperatures rose precipitously from the bitter cold of the previous epoch the Dark Agesto levels several degrees warmer than today. A sudden period of cooling then followed and lasted until the year 1850. This Little Ice Age brought on extremely cold temperatures, corresponding with three periods of protracted solar inactivity, the lowest temperatures coinciding with the quietest of the three (The Maunder Minimum 1645-1710). And then began the modern warming period, which, by the way, many scientists believe ended with the millennium itself."
I think this answers your question as why we 'dont believe'. Not that anyone actually said that.
edit - sorry, I should not have said "we" - I can only speak for why I am not caught up in the GW hype.