by Meliva » Wed Oct 07, 2020 4:08 am
The difference is I'm not saying it is better suited for everyone to learn English, because I know that isn't the truth, and to try to imply that it is is either arrogant or idiotic.
Different languages would be more convenient or better suited for different people based on several factors. How many people already speak it, easyness to learn, amount of folks who can help teach it, etc. Those factors would also affect how easy it would be to teach it to everyone in the world.
You seem to want to ignore all those factors, and just outright state that your belief that everyone learning Esperanto would be the best option best suited for everyone. Which is extremely arrogant.
I won't state that English is the best option for everyone, because I don't have all the facts and knowledge to make that statement. So I'm not going to just blindly say that it's the best option.
Edit- and just to clarify my earlier post where I said English would be the best choice due to it being the most common language, that is simply my belief on what I currently know, but I would want to thoroughly discuss the pros and cons of making it the global language before trying to implement it. I would also listen to other suggestions before going through with anything. I would not, just assume that it would be the best for everyone until thoroughly discussed.
I'm a meanie head! Beware my Meanness