tmn and fox truce

General chit-chat about anything in-game here.
In-game trade offers should be published here
Roleplaying is recommended (Write like as if your character is speaking)

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby MAjesty » Fri Apr 05, 2013 9:56 pm

Two of these things are not like the other... two of these things just doesn't.. belong.

Can you guess which things are not like the others, by the time i finish my song?
User avatar
MAjesty
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Roileon » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:00 pm

Captain blue wrote:But why did you attack? are you gonna say that because IMO was not part of the truce blah blah blah?

No, the truce wasn't stopping me from attacking Bp if you read the truce. Bp is a high value target. All that gold and fame, it's a little hard to miss.
"Dead Mod tell no tales"

Afk, looking for that palm tree island beach of Legends.
User avatar
Roileon
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:39 am

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Roileon » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:05 pm

This was the entire chatroom post. The Name of the chatroom was Fox and the password was Finally

RoiLeon: I disagree to surrender as do you.

RoiLeon: And the point of this chatroom should not be to achieve a surrender.

RoiLeon has left the chatroom

RoiLeon has joined the chatroom

RoiLeon: Of either side. You proposed a truce, so lets get there.

Achillies: that is fine

spastic: hey

spastic: im here to witness right?

Achillies: you must admit that this is not a good way for our guilds to be

Achillies: hey spatic you are right

spastic: cool, ill shut up now

RoiLeon: Now that that's cleared, also suggest that a witness should be a player (and no offense intended) that overall every knows to be ==. Black
Sparrow, Capt. D, Capt. Da Vinci, et cetera. First approval comes from Spastic, second comes from one of the previously listed, is that fine?

spastic: btw, both Ds arnt online right now

Achillies: ROI invite any one of them you trust

RoiLeon: They aren't online, we would send them our final resolve.

Achillies: im good with that and suggested so

Achillies: luffy is here roi if you want him here

RoiLeon: No, me and Luffy were never really close after I left PK. Fox & PK were never allies,

Achillies: sorry some body popped me out

Achillies: thats cool

RoiLeon: But lets begin, I'm fine with how we are now. So, since you started this, what do you suggest that's =

RoiLeon: "Im fine with this chatroom"

RoiLeon: Not the situation of our guilds


Achillies: so this truce should should state 1.) no voodoo to be cast on tmn or Imo members ... nor members of TMN or IMO will cast voodoo on fox.


RoiLeon: Also, for future note, Fox is split into 2 major sects, Merchants, and Pirates. If another war is to break out, then I ask that only the pirates
(Pastry Warriors) are targets.

RoiLeon: And not the merchants who don't harm anyone

Achillies: no if you call for guild war that is every body

RoiLeon: There was never any formal war declared so our guilds were never at war

RoiLeon: This was pointed out by Xepshunall

Achillies: that was not what you posted in tavern forums

RoiLeon: It is not, but I ended it when Xepshunall pointed out there was never a war in the first place so why am I asking you for a surrender

RoiLeon: Which is why I stopped

Achillies: but if you want to set a limited war then i would suggest that we discuss that as a per attack limited war with both sides agreeing to set participants and a time limit

RoiLeon: I agree that this truce should should state 1.) no voodoo to be cast on tmn members ... nor members of TMN will cast voodoo on fox. 2) Our guilds are free to attack each other as the game and rule 1) allows.

Achillies: i agree with terms one and two

RoiLeon: I do not wish to set a war. And spastic, you agree that this is fair?

RoiLeon: 1.) no voodoo to be cast on tmn members ... nor members of TMN will cast voodoo on fox. 2) Our guilds are free to attack each other as the game and rule 1) allows.

RoiLeon: I also think that this truce needs a time limit, and a buffer period after that

spastic: yea its fair, but

spastic: it will probably escalate into war again

Achillies: would there be an alotted time before we resume attacks ship to ship

RoiLeon: How so? And yes I can see 2 days

Achillies: say resume ship to ship atacks as normal in 5 days

spastic: its that how so at me?

RoiLeon: yea, and agreed

spastic: umm well in a hypothetical situation achillies raids a player and has 180 dr

spastic: you attack him 10 times

spastic: a players goes for revenge later

spastic: which could escalate to war, theoretically

RoiLeon: Any war, if war, would be a controlled war, with set limits. Not only, if that player has 180dr, and they are attacked, then we attack back. All of this happens without voodoo. But with this, attacks would have to be with equal fleets due to the Elite v. Free Player, or Voodoo God v. Voodoo
Guerrilla.

Achillies: so to restate no voodoo Period and no attacks ship to ship for 5 days. then we resume after 5 days ship to ship attacks and voodoo stays in your decks

spastic: well did they treaty of Versailles stop germany

spastic: the*

Achillies: as far as ships go run what you got.

RoiLeon: Yea pretty much, but I also think that truces make a boring game and you have to admit having a bad guy like Fox makes the game more
interesting which is why I think this truce should have a time period. 2-3 weeks maybe.

Achillies: well if you want a truce with limits when u get tired of peaceful living post and we will discuss a limited player free for all

spastic: so you want a cease fire?

Achillies: but you need to make sure your players know who is to be included and only those players are targets

RoiLeon: okay,

RoiLeon: I lost half the chat so, the final resolve is...

RoiLeon: to put it formally

Achillies: this is the funniest post ive seen in days.

Zombie jesus

Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:15 pm

Achillies: sorry sytem has a glitch

Achillies: 1.) no voodoo to be cast on tmn members ... nor members of TMN will cast voodoo on fox. 2) Our guilds are free to attack each other as the game and rule 1) allows.

RoiLeon: I also think that this truce needs a time limit, and a buffer period after that . grace period of 5days with no attacks ship to ship.

Achillies: then any attacks as allowed by game rules ship to ship.

Achillies: any voodoo to be used only after a limited player list is agreed to. then the war between said combatants is free for all no holds barred within preset time limit.

Achillies: is that correct

RoiLeon: Correct

Achillies: that should also in clude newbies from imo

RoiLeon: Fox doesn't attack newbies of IMO, are u sure that isn't Skyhawk/PK

Achillies: or members

Achillies: my bad

Achillies: you are right The newbies was PK

Achillies: then we have a truce

RoiLeon: yep

Achillies: ok all greed good discussing this with you roi i think we may be able to work togther better this is very positive

spastic: cool

spastic: every1 is happy

spastic: am i still needed?

Achillies: spastic for doing this and no you can leave

Achillies: thanks for meeting with me roi have a good day

spastic: anytime

spastic: im just upset that there was no yelling

Achillies: you so bad spastic

Achillies: lolol

spastic: haha

spastic: cya
"Dead Mod tell no tales"

Afk, looking for that palm tree island beach of Legends.
User avatar
Roileon
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:39 am

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby MAjesty » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:09 pm

achillies! you talk about me fondly even when im not in the room! i knew it! i knew you still care!

i was getting worried
User avatar
MAjesty
 
Posts: 621
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Captain Blue » Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:09 pm

Roileon wrote:This was the entire chatroom post. The Name of the chatroom was Fox and the password was Finally
Achillies: 1.) no voodoo to be cast on tmn members ... nor members of TMN will cast voodoo on fox. 2) Our guilds are free to attack each other as the game and rule 1) allows.

RoiLeon: I also think that this truce needs a time limit, and a buffer period after that . grace period of 5days with no attacks ship to ship.

Achillies: then any attacks as allowed by game rules ship to ship.

Achillies: any voodoo to be used only after a limited player list is agreed to. then the war between said combatants is free for all no holds barred within preset time limit.

Achillies: is that correct

RoiLeon: Correct

Achillies: that should also in clude newbies from imo

RoiLeon: Fox doesn't attack newbies of IMO, are u sure that isn't Skyhawk/PK

Achillies: or members

Achillies: my bad

Achillies: you are right The newbies was PK

Achillies: then we have a truce

RoiLeon: yep


So even though it wasn't formally written on the truce you guys did talk about not attacking IMO members as part of the truce. On the part above A mentioned IMO members again because you only keep mentioning TMN, when he ask "then we have a truce" and you said "yep" that means you agreed on a that there will be no attacks on IMO.

I dunno whether you hold a grudge or something on ABP but she still part of IMO also Trith who you guys just attacked tonight and bombarded with voodoo
Follow Your Dreams & No Matter What, Protect Your Pirate Honor!
User avatar
Captain Blue
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 3:23 pm

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Random pandah » Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:10 pm

Random pandah wrote:u might as well just make a tmn and imo truce just cuz




this, is still a legit idea ^_^
~rawr~


i is a kawaii pandah, rite? im super cuddleh, rite? RITE? RITE?!?!?!?!?!?!?
User avatar
Random pandah
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:04 am

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Captain Blue » Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:12 pm

LOL pandah techinically IMO is part of TMN so there is no need for truce...
Follow Your Dreams & No Matter What, Protect Your Pirate Honor!
User avatar
Captain Blue
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 3:23 pm

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Random pandah » Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:14 am

if u consider it that way, isnt phoenixs attacking trith during this last raid a form of danger manipulation? if its not, then imo and tmn have to be considered separate and if so, then u would need a separate treaty thing
~rawr~


i is a kawaii pandah, rite? im super cuddleh, rite? RITE? RITE?!?!?!?!?!?!?
User avatar
Random pandah
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:04 am

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Roileon » Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:40 am

Random pandah wrote:if u consider it that way, isnt phoenixs attacking trith during this last raid a form of danger manipulation? if its not, then imo and tmn have to be considered separate and if so, then u would need a separate treaty thing

If you guys are the same, then it was danger manipulation. If it wasn't, then IMO still doesn't count on the truce. Not only Achilles said it himself that IMO wasn't included. And he took the part about IMO newbs out because we never attacked IMO newbs and we still haven't, even then, we still didn't break the truce cuz we didn't hit newbs :o No matter how you try to read this, Fox NEVER BROKE THE TRUCE :D I know, it sucks that the guild filled all the "bad guys" is actually obeying the truce and you guys, the "good guys who manipulate danger for the third time" can't break the truce because then you guys look horrible to the community and Fox really is innocent in that scenario. It sucks that the "bad guys" are keeping their word and following truces. Maybe, since Fox doesn't break the rules, and TMN and IMO do it all the time, maybe we really are the "good guys" :shock: We are bringing a new sort of age to help PG refigure itself out. A New Dawn. A New Age, of Fox.
"Dead Mod tell no tales"

Afk, looking for that palm tree island beach of Legends.
User avatar
Roileon
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:39 am

Re: tmn and fox truce

Postby Juicypotato » Sat Apr 06, 2013 12:41 am

Captain Blue= Phoenix
hahahahahahahahaha

I'm an evil potato
User avatar
Juicypotato
 
Posts: 568
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 4:18 am

PreviousNext

Return to Tavern

cron