I love talking about alternate/multi accounts Bonanza

[Captain Mac Snow]

I told you already my creteria. I don't have any obligation to define anything, but still I'm doing it so I get my answer. But your question was only a distraction for you to stop answering. That's why I didn't want to answer. You stop talking for the important questions until you get an answer about a bullshit according to my personal views.

I'm asking about the game rules man. If I utilize my account to push Nelson's, is against the rules. Why is it ok for Hightop?

There are evidence that Hightop spend all those resources and you claimed the benefit. So why am I crazy?

You are making the claims, so the burden is on you to define it.

I'm not answering your question because it's a catch 22. The obvious answer is that it wouldn't be, but the question implies that Hightop is guilty of a rule violation. So by saying No, I would be agreeing that Hightop is violating rules, which isn't supported by fact, and is only speculative. I'm not stupid, and thus won't give you that satisfaction.

If you want to act like the smartest person in the room, you damn well better be the smartest person in the room

I asked why is it ok, not if it is. Obviously you telling me it is ok the whole time, I just don't see why. So once again why Dez? Why is it OK for Hightop?

As for the red letters, I made the report as you didn't provide any answer not because it was not of my liking.

[Mack]

The milking thing or how ever you want to call it is more important to me.

If my theory about how he is doing it is correct, you can't really prove it...

[DezNutz]

I told you already my creteria. I don't have any obligation to define anything, but still I'm doing it so I get my answer. But your question was only a distraction for you to stop answering. That's why I didn't want to answer. You stop talking for the important questions until you get an answer about a bullshit according to my personal views.

I'm asking about the game rules man. If I utilize my account to push Nelson's, is against the rules. Why is it ok for Hightop?

There are evidence that Hightop spend all those resources and you claimed the benefit. So why am I crazy?

You are making the claims, so the burden is on you to define it.

I'm not answering your question because it's a catch 22. The obvious answer is that it wouldn't be, but the question implies that Hightop is guilty of a rule violation. So by saying No, I would be agreeing that Hightop is violating rules, which isn't supported by fact, and is only speculative. I'm not stupid, and thus won't give you that satisfaction.

If you want to act like the smartest person in the room, you damn well better be the smartest person in the room

I asked why is it ok, not if it is. Obviously you telling me it is ok the whole time, I just don't see why. So once again why Dez? Why is it OK for Hightop?

As for the red letters, I made the report as you didn't provide any answer not because it was not of my liking.

Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule. That's not a fact and is only speculation. Your belief that he is violating rules doesn't make it fact. I've explained this already, I'm not going to give you an answer that you will turn around to use to say that admins/mods agree that Hightop is violating rules, when there is no evidence that supports those claims. Stop being willfully obtuse.


Again, a mod is not obligated to answer you at all, let alone give you an answer to your liking. Demanding that they as a mod respond and reporting them for failing to respond to you are admin baiting.

[Lil Lola]

Des what the f***????? Now he is asking for private info???!!!!! This is beyond ridiculous!

Last warning with the language. Refrain from personal insults. -Dez

Dez I get the language but personal insult? That was an exclamation ya know.

[Captain Mac Snow]

Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule. That's not a fact and is only speculation. Your belief that he is violating rules doesn't make it fact. I've explained this already, I'm not going to give you an answer that you will turn around to use to say that admins/mods agree that Hightop is violating rules, when there is no evidence that supports those claims. Stop being willfully obtuse.


Again, a mod is not obligated to answer you at all, let alone give you an answer to your liking. Demanding that they as a mod respond and reporting them for failing to respond to you are admin baiting.

once again.. "Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule."NO, IF its ok. i'm asking WHY is it ok? in your perspective you find it resonable.. why is that? why if i utilize my account to push nelson would be any different from the outcome of this account till this day? how much time is enough to call something a proof? do you have to milk this account for a year to call it milking? why is it ok? in your perspective ofcourse...

[DezNutz]

Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule. That's not a fact and is only speculation. Your belief that he is violating rules doesn't make it fact. I've explained this already, I'm not going to give you an answer that you will turn around to use to say that admins/mods agree that Hightop is violating rules, when there is no evidence that supports those claims. Stop being willfully obtuse.


Again, a mod is not obligated to answer you at all, let alone give you an answer to your liking. Demanding that they as a mod respond and reporting them for failing to respond to you are admin baiting.

once again.. "Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule."NO, IF its ok. i'm asking WHY is it ok? in your perspective you find it resonable.. why is that? why if i utilize my account to push nelson would be any different from the outcome of this account till this day? how much time is enough to call something a proof? do you have to milk this account for a year to call it milking? why is it ok? in your perspective ofcourse...

Again, stop asking questions that stipulate that I concede that Hightop is violating game rules, when there exists no definitive evidence of the such.

When you ask an unloaded question, you will get an answer.

And you still haven't answered my question on where a player stops being a newbie and starts being an experienced player.

[Captain Mac Snow]

Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule. That's not a fact and is only speculation. Your belief that he is violating rules doesn't make it fact. I've explained this already, I'm not going to give you an answer that you will turn around to use to say that admins/mods agree that Hightop is violating rules, when there is no evidence that supports those claims. Stop being willfully obtuse.


Again, a mod is not obligated to answer you at all, let alone give you an answer to your liking. Demanding that they as a mod respond and reporting them for failing to respond to you are admin baiting.

once again.. "Your asking if it is ok is asserting that Hightop is violating a rule."NO, IF its ok. i'm asking WHY is it ok? in your perspective you find it resonable.. why is that? why if i utilize my account to push nelson would be any different from the outcome of this account till this day? how much time is enough to call something a proof? do you have to milk this account for a year to call it milking? why is it ok? in your perspective ofcourse...

Again, stop asking questions that stipulate that I concede that Hightop is violating game rules, when there exists no definitive evidence of the such.

When you ask an unloaded question, you will get an answer.

And you still haven't answered my question on where a player stops being a newbie and starts being an experienced player.

My brother, please read!

You say what Hightop is doing is OK. Is not violating any rules.

I'm asking you what would be the difference between me and hightop if i start spending all my resources to push Nelson (for example). What is it that justifies what he is doing?

[DezNutz]

Again, stop asking questions that stipulate that I concede that Hightop is violating game rules, when there exists no definitive evidence of the such.

When you ask an unloaded question, you will get an answer.

And you still haven't answered my question on where a player stops being a newbie and starts being an experienced player.

My brother, please read!

You say what Hightop is doing is OK. Is not violating any rules.

I'm asking you what would be the difference between me and hightop if i start spending all my resources to push Nelson (for example). What is it that justifies what he is doing?

I have read it. You are comparing definitive a rule violation to a suspected rule violation.

The difference would be that you would be committing a definitive rule violation.

What is hightop doing that needs to be justified? I'm not seeing the correlation other than you trying to say that he is violating rules without proof.


And don't look know, but you continue to deflect and still haven't answered my question about what defines the difference between a newb and an experienced player.

[Captain Mac Snow]

Again, stop asking questions that stipulate that I concede that Hightop is violating game rules, when there exists no definitive evidence of the such.

When you ask an unloaded question, you will get an answer.

And you still haven't answered my question on where a player stops being a newbie and starts being an experienced player.

My brother, please read!

You say what Hightop is doing is OK. Is not violating any rules.

I'm asking you what would be the difference between me and hightop if i start spending all my resources to push Nelson (for example). What is it that justifies what he is doing?

I have read it. You are comparing definitive a rule violation to a suspected rule violation.

The difference would be that you would be committing a definitive rule violation.

What is hightop doing that needs to be justified? I'm not seeing the correlation other than you trying to say that he is violating rules without proof.


And don't look know, but you continue to deflect and still haven't answered my question about what defines the difference between a newb and an experienced player.

Proof

1. Hightop spend 600 M on influence to get the port with you.
2. Hightop got 0 compensantion back. Proof on this thread by your saying.
3. Hightop spend aproximately around 375M-750M on HNs cast to PR guild.
4. Hightop never attacked to claim the gold. All the gold was claimed by VUDU members. Again 0 compensation given proof can be found in this thread.

so in conclussion

1. Hightop spend more than 1B the last 9 months
2. You people took all the benefit from those casts. ( my 60m, along with lets say 50 M from every other member) so lets say you got like 600M- 1B?
3. He got 0 compensation as you guys said, along with 0 profit from trading. His Voodoo stack remains the same.

So how is this account utilized for itself? isn't it just constantly losing resources with 0 benefit? I mean am i blind?? do i miss something here?? How is this any different from if i leave guild turn pirate and start pushing my guild and spend every singe gc and credit for this cause?

[Dmanwuzhere]

Proof

1. Hightop spend 600 M on influence to get the port with you. how do you know what he spent
2. Hightop got 0 compensantion back. Proof on this thread by your saying. ports are rarely money makers
3. Hightop spend aproximately around 375M-750M on HNs cast to PR guild. how much has your guild spent on him without a ROI
4. Hightop never attacked to claim the gold. All the gold was claimed by VUDU members. Again 0 compensation given proof can be found in this thread. proof in this thread... do you mean because you typed it many times before

so in conclussion

1. Hightop spend more than 1B the last 9 months where did he get this billion
2. You people took all the benefit from those casts. ( my 60m, along with lets say 50 M from every other member) so lets say you got like 600M- 1B?
you people... meaning every guild that had a member hit or does only vudu hits count
3. He got 0 compensation as you guys said, along with 0 profit from trading. His Voodoo stack remains the same.
i can light you up and not hit you and be rewarded enough by your crying to not even bother hitting you

So how is this account utilized for itself? isn't it just constantly losing resources with 0 benefit? I mean am i blind?? do i miss something here?? How is this any different from if i leave guild turn pirate and start pushing my guild and spend every singe gc and credit for this cause?


User avatar
Captain Mac Snow

Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 4:35 pm