Ahoy!

As some of you know recently I have not been very active in the game; I have been logging on for presents and that is about it. The main reason is I have made my own review website, where I review all sorts from games to content creators. I have now made a review for Pirates Glory, feel free to read the article and look around my website.

My Website: https://criticreviews.org

Review of Pirates Glory: https://criticreviews.org/Review/Pirates-Glory-(Version-1.9.255)

If there are any recommendations you have, please say.

I would also like to thank the Administrator for letting me post this.

Thank you for your time,
Admiral Nelson.

Reading through the Review. Seems interesting. The gist of the review is good, you obviously know what you are talking about. However your review is not structured writing and suffers because of it. This shows in how you don't explain key concepts which you mention and their are superfluous sentences. Alongside that you need to proof read it more times before publishing it, since the review has multiple grammar mistakes that another read through would find. Another solution is to get a proof reader to read it for you.

Some Mistakes, I found:
Typo in the below sentence, 4th paragraph
You can also attack None Player Targets; with this, you can get gold and fame
It is should be Non-Player Targets

This sentence Needs to be completely redone. It makes little sense, as it seems like three starting sentences all at once.
What makes the game is the community, are they toxic as hell players or are they so welcoming its off-putting? Well, Pirates Glory community is quite unique.
I suggest you only have one of the below sentences and follow it on with a supporting sentence.
Pirates Glory Community, Toxic or Welcoming? Neither ...
What makes Pirates Glory Awesome, is it's community. Shown by its ...
Pirate Glory's community is unique because ...

There are more mistakes, I just don't want to point them all out and be mean.

An easy way to structure paragraphs is Point, Evidence, Explanation and link. This is not the best for articles but a good general structure.
Point: A sentence starting the paragraph, giving the topic addressed
Evidence: A sentence saying why the point is true
Explanation: A sentence explaining the evidence
Link: A sentence to link to the next paragraph or to the greater topic.

Sorry if I am raining on your parade. You obviously put effort into this and are hoping to turn it into something. I wish you luck on continuing your website.

Hey Nelson,
I read your review of PG and thought it was pretty well done.
Liked the screen shots and explanations. Thanks for helping to promote PG.

Snowy McScruffy wrote:Reading through the Review. Seems interesting. The gist of the review is good, you obviously know what you are talking about. However your review is not structured writing and suffers because of it. This shows in how you don't explain key concepts which you mention and their are superfluous sentences. Alongside that you need to proof read it more times before publishing it, since the review has multiple grammar mistakes that another read through would find. Another solution is to get a proof reader to read it for you.

Some Mistakes, I found:
Typo in the below sentence, 4th paragraph
You can also attack None Player Targets; with this, you can get gold and fame
It is should be Non-Player Targets

This sentence Needs to be completely redone. It makes little sense, as it seems like three starting sentences all at once.
What makes the game is the community, are they toxic as hell players or are they so welcoming its off-putting? Well, Pirates Glory community is quite unique.
I suggest you only have one of the below sentences and follow it on with a supporting sentence.
Pirates Glory Community, Toxic or Welcoming? Neither ...
What makes Pirates Glory Awesome, is it's community. Shown by its ...
Pirate Glory's community is unique because ...

There are more mistakes, I just don't want to point them all out and be mean.

An easy way to structure paragraphs is Point, Evidence, Explanation and link. This is not the best for articles but a good general structure.
Point: A sentence starting the paragraph, giving the topic addressed
Evidence: A sentence saying why the point is true
Explanation: A sentence explaining the evidence
Link: A sentence to link to the next paragraph or to the greater topic.

Sorry if I am raining on your parade. You obviously put effort into this and are hoping to turn it into something. I wish you luck on continuing your website.

Seems you have an eye for news and novelty from your post.

If your interested in helping out around here or want to play a part of helping PG, let me know and I’ll see what we can do.

Im Smog, #66509

Updated the links to my site, as I changed the URL format from a 16 digit code to the title of the review.

That way, PG forums is not pointing to a dead link.

Good review Nelson. How many hits have you had so far?

SilverShadow wrote:Good review Nelson. How many hits have you had so far?

Hits on the review, or hits on the website?...

Hits on the review: 251

Since its only the 6th of this month, I will show last months "Hits" as a whole from last months figures:

Hits: 41,214

Shalmon to you all, 5 Credits to the first person who gets that quote.

Anyhow onwards...

I have remastered/redesigned Critic Reviews and with it brings the tedious task of remastering all reviews. I would imagine posting this link is fine, for Admin allowed previous one, too. Plus: Its not like the game does not benefit from this, for their is an advertisement live on my site that links to this game.

To see a remastered Review on Pirates Glory, Click here: https://www.criticreviews.org/Review/Pi ... 018-Review

Next, I will remaster the 2019 Review once the trade routes interface gets launched I will do a completely new 2020 Review for PG.

Nice work Nelson, congrats.

As someone who works in media, what Snowy said....excellent tips to give w/s more professional edge.
I am happy to proofread PG if you want. I do it all day anyway..lol

will check it out