As the port trade agreement between USA and Egypt leadership concluded, many USA voices came forward objecting to the trade. These voices accused the current USA leadership of treason and Egypt's leadership of greed and breaking the NAP.

Egypt leadership maintains that it abides by the NAP and vows that should the civil unrest in USA leads to change in leadership, Egypt will extend a friendly hand to the new leadership offering the continuation of the NAP and alliance.

Egypt's King expresses willingness to support USA and its leadership in any way that doesn't conflict with other existing alliances and agreements.

It is up to USA in this upcoming times to determine who they would like to lead their nation and speak for all citizens.

PhoenixKnight wrote:As the port trade agreement between USA and Egypt leadership concluded, many USA voices came forward objecting to the trade. These voices accused the current USA leadership of treason and Egypt's leadership of greed and breaking the NAP.

The US Leadership, of LT and Danik, is committing treason; however, that is an internal problem that isn't Egypt's or any other nation's direct concern. Egypt made a deal with the apparent, albeit contested, leadership of the US. It is not their problem that the US is in a civil war. The protesting US Dukes could have made efforts to thwart a sale to foreign nations by simply contacting the leaders of the foreign nations. Words can be powerful.

There is more than one US Citizen accusing Egypt of breaking the NAP?

Deznutz wrote:

PhoenixKnight wrote:As the port trade agreement between USA and Egypt leadership concluded, many USA voices came forward objecting to the trade. These voices accused the current USA leadership of treason and Egypt's leadership of greed and breaking the NAP.

The US Leadership, of LT and Danik, is committing treason; however, that is an internal problem that isn't Egypt's or any other nation's direct concern. Egypt made a deal with the apparent, albeit contested, leadership of the US. It is not their problem that the US is in a civil war. The protesting US Dukes could have made efforts to thwart a sale to foreign nations by simply contacting the leaders of the foreign nations. Words can be powerful.

There is more than one US Citizen accusing Egypt of breaking the NAP?

What is treason? In a monarchy, such as the USA is in this game, to speak, act or conspire against the lawful King is Treason. TheLoveTiger is the lawful King and may act as he sees fit, advised by his council but not bound by them.
There is but one defence against a charge of treason : and that is to win the throne for the King cannot commit treason against themself : simples. So, if you object to the Kings actions, put up the coin to take the throne, or whine about it : We can see which course Mack prefers.

We will say what we want if the king dont like that he can try to shut us up then

I claim leadership of the US for the king is incapable of making rational decisions for the nation.. does anyone object

Danik wrote:

Deznutz wrote:

PhoenixKnight wrote:As the port trade agreement between USA and Egypt leadership concluded, many USA voices came forward objecting to the trade. These voices accused the current USA leadership of treason and Egypt's leadership of greed and breaking the NAP.

The US Leadership, of LT and Danik, is committing treason; however, that is an internal problem that isn't Egypt's or any other nation's direct concern. Egypt made a deal with the apparent, albeit contested, leadership of the US. It is not their problem that the US is in a civil war. The protesting US Dukes could have made efforts to thwart a sale to foreign nations by simply contacting the leaders of the foreign nations. Words can be powerful.

There is more than one US Citizen accusing Egypt of breaking the NAP?

What is treason? In a monarchy, such as the USA is in this game, to speak, act or conspire against the lawful King is Treason. TheLoveTiger is the lawful King and may act as he sees fit, advised by his council but not bound by them.
There is but one defence against a charge of treason : and that is to win the throne for the King cannot commit treason against themself : simples. So, if you object to the Kings actions, put up the coin to take the throne, or whine about it : We can see which course Mack prefers.

It is treason against the nation. A king that acts in the benefit of other nations at the detriment of his own is committing treason.

As for your reference to a monarchy, normal citizens don't rise to ranks of nobility. And citizens of foreign nations could not switch nations and rise to become nobility. Nobility was through blood. And heirs to the thrown were not decided by who held the most influence in the nation at the time.

Deznutz wrote:

Danik wrote:

Deznutz wrote:
The US Leadership, of LT and Danik, is committing treason; however, that is an internal problem that isn't Egypt's or any other nation's direct concern. Egypt made a deal with the apparent, albeit contested, leadership of the US. It is not their problem that the US is in a civil war. The protesting US Dukes could have made efforts to thwart a sale to foreign nations by simply contacting the leaders of the foreign nations. Words can be powerful.

There is more than one US Citizen accusing Egypt of breaking the NAP?

What is treason? In a monarchy, such as the USA is in this game, to speak, act or conspire against the lawful King is Treason. TheLoveTiger is the lawful King and may act as he sees fit, advised by his council but not bound by them.
There is but one defence against a charge of treason : and that is to win the throne for the King cannot commit treason against themself : simples. So, if you object to the Kings actions, put up the coin to take the throne, or whine about it : We can see which course Mack prefers.

It is treason against the nation. A king that acts in the benefit of other nations at the detriment of his own is committing treason.

As for your reference to a monarchy, normal citizens don't rise to ranks of nobility. And citizens of foreign nations could not switch nations and rise to become nobility. Nobility was through blood. And heirs to the thrown were not decided by who held the most influence in the nation at the time.

Utter rubbish : William the Conqueror took the throne of England without bothering about blood ties or residency requirements : as did William and Mary : Napoleon put relatives on half the thrones of Europe without worrying about it too. The Conquistadores deposed kings by the dozen in claiming the New World for Spain : colonial powers did likewise in Africa, Asia and India.
But this is not there : this is Avonmora and all that is required to be a lawful King is to complete the nation missions and gather enough influence : this TheLoveTiger has done : that's it, he is King and can rule accordingly as he sees fit : any objection, put up the coin to install a King more to your liking : if not, you are stuck with him until some-one else does :

Through blood and sweat.. not by simply moving there huh

You can try to justify if you want just makes you look silly

USA has a wonderful Town Crier. Will King LT rent him out to earn extra coin ?